User talk:Lahiru k/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

User talk:24.4.231.98

Hello, how are you keeping tabs on my user page? I thot it was a private page. I was editing using my IP address because I wanted it logged for future reference and easy access. I don't understand why another user is monitoring my user pages.Mactographer 06:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm not monitoring your user page but I was monitoring recent IP edits[1]. Pleas log-in next time other wise recent changes patrollers will take those as vandalism. ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 06:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I see. I guess none of the pages are really private. Well, thanks for patroling. No vandalism going on, I just wanted my IP logged for my own use. Thanks.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Mactographer 06:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Looks like someone was vandalizing THIS page tho... But someone else fixed them before I could... thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mactographer (talkcontribs).

Yep, thats called WP:RCP

♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 06:48, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I didn't

I didn't remove anything, merely moved a sentence in brackets to the right spot, and deleted an apostrophe that wasn't needed. I would appreciate not being talked to like I am a child. Thank you.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.159.37.60 (talkcontribs).

Yeah it was a mistake. Thank you for letting me know. Ooh before leaving, that message, I didn't create that it was a template. See Template:TestTemplates. Happy editing!!! --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 07:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry. I accidentally rollbacked your RV which I thought was vandalism. Again sorry. Culverin? Talk 07:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh just forget it pal. We humans are dedicated to do mistakes. Happy editing!!! ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 07:26, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, fellow Wikipedian. I write in regards to the proposal you may have made that The Open Design Community be deleted from Wikipedia. I agree with you but if you takes some time you will find that while TODC is a neew site, only being up for two weeks, it has had around 9,000 unique visitors and around 100,000 page views. TODC is a great site that is worthy of being on Wikipedia. It is actually the third generation in the OSWD line (marked by when the community reformed to create a new site).

The bottom line is TODC is a strong community who is worthy of being in Wikipedia. I am going to try to add more to the entry soon. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Megajames (talkcontribs).

Hi there, you did a great job by starting The Open Design Community article

. But Melchoir says its violating Wikipedia guideline Wikipedia:Notability (web). Don't be afraid about that. First read Wikipedia:Notability (web) well and try to find in article where it seems violating, or ask for help directly from Melchoir. I'm pretty sure that he may help you because he is an Administrator. Good luck!!! --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 08:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Different IP?

Regarding this report at AIV, perhaps you meant a different vandal IP? This IP doesn't have anything on talk.--Kchase T 07:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, It was a mistake. He was keep vandalizing the The Law & Order Franchise article. I thought he was already warned. I hope you guys will forgive me. ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 07:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

No sweat, I just wanted to make sure there wasn't some prolific IP vandal on the loose that you meant to report and really needed it blocked. Keep reporting to AIV. The occasional misfire happens to the best of us.--Kchase T 07:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 07:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
OK, I gave it a shot by removing the nowiki tags in your monobook.js file. Let me know how it goes.--Kchase T 19:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Huh, I don't know what's wrong. I'd try dropping a line at WP:VPA, or the help desk to see if a more technically inclined user can figure it out. Alternatively, ask for help on IRC. They're usually just hanging around chatting anyway. Hope the problem gets solved. Good luck!Kchase T 19:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Needlessly removing content?

Define "needlessly". I removed biased quotes from an article that are clearly POV, replacing them with more neutral wording. Isn't this what Wikipedia is about? Also, your warning states that I have been warned about this before...nope.207.216.49.234 09:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah I know that Wikipedia is full of bias and even I had to face that problem. But when you do any edits in wikipedia next time, please justify it by adding edit summery. Other wise vandal reverters like me may take those constructive edits as vandalism. Happy editing!!! --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 10:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Ah, okay, thanks for the clarification!207.216.49.234 10:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)


NVM figured it out, sorry

Great Job

You have done a great job of fighting vandalism here at wikipedia. By the way if you ever have a dispute with someone i can helpm out, I am a member of AMA.--Sir james paul 12:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Kokilai sat pic.JPG

An image that you uploaded, Image:Kokilai sat pic.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

ccwaters 19:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Kokilai sat pic.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kokilai sat pic.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ccwaters 19:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC) ccwaters 19:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

It's Copyrighted Google. Check out [2]. ccwaters 19:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Doughboy (character)

I didn't remove content, I added it. The little I removed was negligible. Check it again and add stuff back if you want, but there's no need to do a total rv. Thank you. Tommythegun 19 December 2006 07:31 (UTC)

When you do any edits in wikipedia next time, please justify it by adding edit summery. Other wise vandal reverters like me may take those constructive edits as vandalism. Happy editing!!! --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 07:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Will do. Keep up the good work. Tommythegun 19 December 2006 07:52 (UTC)

Why

why do you keep undoing my edits—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.113.228.25 (talkcontribs).

Because you didn't provide sufficient edit summary s and these edits are looks like obvious vandalism.[3][4][5] --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 08:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Goldberg

Thanks, I guess, um can someone please lock the article me and a few other users had to edit that crap out for two days already and someone keeps putting back in blantanly false claims that Goldberg signed with WWE.--24.184.169.37 16:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Smile

The only way I KNOW HOW TO get to someones blocklog is by looking at there contributions. Will you please give me a link to them so a can acces your block log. Thanks.--§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 11:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Do you want me to give you a vandalism fighting tool?--§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 11:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Needlessly Removed?

I was told that I needlessly removed content from the Need For Speed Underground 2 game, when in fact I removed content that was needless. It was a poorly written game type for a game when in fact it doesn't even exist in the game. I completely understand why you would think that if you have not played it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MikeFez (talkcontribs) 02:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC).

Hi

Here is a link to the message I recieved from you [6]

I just want to let you know, I didnt mean to erase anything and I thought I looked over it before I posted it. Sorry, just a wiki newbie mistake.

I just wanted to add the actor's birth year, which I found via Imdb.

Thanks—The preceding unsigned comment was added by X86bsdunix (talkcontribs).

I didn't vanalize

I didn't vanalize this page i was simply looking up a vocab word, direct characterization, for English. When did that become vandalism?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.138.163.5 (talkcontribs).

These two edits are look like simple, but obvious vandalism. Thats why I gave you, level one ({{test}}) warn. [7], [8] --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 14:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

My page

Yes, I borrowed it from you, Thanks RaveenS 15:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Physical Therapy

Whoops, sorry about that; I was monitoring RCs and made a mistake there.

Apologies, WHeimbigner 16:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

No worries, just forget it pal. We humans are dedicated to do mistakes. Happy editing!!! --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 16:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

BARNSTAR

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
This is for being a very civil editor. §Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 17:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Kent and Dollar Farm massacres-related images

Hi, earlier today you uploaded Image:Kids were in kent.JPG, Image:Kent-farm2.jpg, & Image:Kent-farm.jpg under a{{CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat}} license which included a note prohibiting any alteration of the contents or source of the images. Licenses that do not allow modification and redistribution of images are not compatible with the GFDL and are not considered "free" licenses in the context of Wikipedia use. These images might still be used in accordance with Wikipedia fair use criteria, but they would need to be retagged and you would need to provide a Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Fair_use_rationale rationale for their use. Otherwise these images will be listed for deletion at WP:PUI. Thanks ˉˉanetode╦╩ 14:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Anton Balasingham image

Why was the previous image spam ? because you have replaced with an image that seem to have copy right problem. The previous image can be cropped if you dont like what is written on it. RaveenS 20:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I don't know and I don't want to know the content of that picture(Balaannanswiss 2.jpg), but I'm pretty sure that it can be categorized as SPAM because it was released by LTTE. I don't mind if you can crop that picture and upload it in to the article, or else you can change the license of Anton Balasingham1.jpg into Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Fair_use_rationale rationale. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 21:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Dominic Jeeva

Hello!

I have done a extensive copyedit to the article on Dominic Jeeva (diff). However I have not been able to address the fundamental issue of whether or not he is still alive. Could you perhaps bring some clarity on that point?

Sincerely,--Oden 10:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

thanks

Cheqbot 17:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Vandal?

You've done this about a hundred times my vote-stacking friend, however it's Christmas time and I felt all jolly and wanting to call you out on it.

15:01, 23 December 2006 Lahiru k (Talk | contribs) (Restore vandalism by sharz & and some minor corrections)

I challenge you to prove your statement that I vandalized that page, It's most blatantly obvious that you've branded every minor offence to your belief's on Wikipedia, but it's ironic though because you actually slap on a wiki policy that has nothing to do with the incident. For example, your blanking of the STF page repedidly then coming up with the tenacity to say "RV Blanking". Well, if your accurate in your words, I suggest you back them up, though I'm sure that you'll most likely ignore this message and let it fade away, as with any other call to justify yourself on your talk page. --Sharz 23:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

  • You've done this about a hundred times my vote-stacking friend, however it's Christmas time and I felt all jolly and wanting to call you out on it.
I was accused for what I didn't do. I will prove that I was innocent for that in near future and I hope that you have enjoyed my Christmas hamper that I sent you on December 14.
  • I challenge you to prove your statement that I vandalized that page,
Here it is. [9]
  • It's most blatantly obvious that you've branded every minor offence to your belief's on Wikipedia, but it's ironic though because you actually slap on a wiki policy that has nothing to do with the incident. For example, your blanking of the STF page repedidly then coming up with the tenacity to say "RV Blanking".
Come up with evidence come up with evidence than crying on my talk page.
  • I'm sure that you'll most likely ignore this message and let it fade away, as with any other call to justify yourself on your talk page.
I Always try to keep my edits with summaries and give feedback to every considerable messages. Though this was cannot classified to that, but I had to. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 16:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Christmas Hamper? I have no clue what that means but my spidey sense tells me something sinister. As for your so called proof, again, you've cited a page, however try citiing a WIKIPEDIA OFFICIAL POLICY and the line from the Wikipedia of which it violates. --Sharz 23:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
I have provided you a diff of the vandalism you did for your easiness and thats proof enough. But even that you can't understand, thats ridiculous. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 08:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I've already seen that page, and it has absolutely no breaches of Wikipedia policy regarding vandalism, your response on 08:46 26 of December made little to no grammatical sense, please consider rephrasing it so it is understandable to me, I completely understand though I am a native English speaker, English is a second language to most. --Sharz 13:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Help

What did you need help with again. I think it had something to do with your block.--§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 02:17, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for offering your help my friend.

I was accused for what I didn't do . But I will take necessary actions against that in near future . The funniest thing in that was, I'm currently communicating with three of my confirmed sock puppets through e mails and some how I made an approach to get their help on my future actions. Until that take some experience, because I will need your help desperately on that. Oh not only that, the person who submit that case was accused for vote stacking using multipel accounts and blocked indefinitely. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 16:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Do you mind telling me exactly what happened? --§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 16:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

No prob. First read this. I'm contributing to the Wikipedia from Sri Lanka and currently using Sri Lanka Telecom ADSL Broadband connection. Normally the process for checkuser is the person who submitting the case should provide evidence. User:Elalan had provide evidence against User:Snowolfd4, but not against me. I was caught up for this issue because Sri Lanka Telecom had assigned considerably small number of IPs to its ADSL IP pool and they issue those IPs dynamicaly. As I know other 3 of my confirmed sockpuppets that I told I was communicating through e mail, even they are using SLT ADSL and checkuser admin has assume that all wikipedia users who has SLT ADSL IPs as my sockpuppets. To get a wide understanding regarding this issue please read this ArbCom request or ask directly from me. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 17:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Do you want me to try to get these sockpuppets unblocked? If so I think I can do it. I have helped get someone unblocked on meta wiki. --§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 17:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah if you can please look in to this. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 17:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)