Talk:Labour Party (Netherlands)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is related to the WikiProject Politics, an attempt to improve, organise and standardise Wikipedia's articles in the area of Politics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.. |
|||
I think this page is not organized well. I also think that it's strange that the pages about dutch parties differ to much in layout. I would therefore like to propose one scheme to organize all dutch political parties lay out. Any reactions? or can I implement this in all dutch political parties?
Introduction NAME (in Dutch: NAAM, AFK) was a dutch IDEOLOGY party
Party History
-Period A (foundation)
-Period B (...)
-Period C (dissolution)
Ideology & Issues
-Main ideology
-Economic Issues
-Ethical Issues
-International Issues
-National Issues
Members
-Leadership
-Ministers
-Members of parliament(s)
-Mayors
-Members
-Organizational structure
Electorate
-Sociological Characteristics
-Linked organisations
-International organisations
-Pillarized organisations
-Relationships to other parties
External Links
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS to move article, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 03:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Labour Party (Netherlands) → Partij van de Arbeid – "The party is called 'Partij van de Arbeid'. Though Labour Party is the English translation, that is not what the Dutch party is called. —JackSparrow Ninja 00:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)" copied from WP:RM by AjaxSmack 01:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
Add "# Support" or "# Oppose" on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
[edit] Survey - in support of the move
[edit] Survey - in opposition to the move
- Oppose per WP:UE but might support a move to Dutch Labour Party. The party's official website uses the English name as in "This is the English website of the Dutch Labour Party, in the Netherlands known as Partij van de Arbeid (the PvdA)" [1], "Manifesto, Dutch Labour Party" [2], "Discussion Paper Prepared by the Dutch Labour Party’s Working Group on Europe" [3], &c. (Plus, party van could be ambiguous.) — AjaxSmack 01:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. All Dutch parties have been standardized in this version per WP:UE. I would prefer to keep this name Labour Party (Netherlands), because it is clear and simple. C mon 12:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per C mon; I'm not sure about Dutch Labour Party. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- C mon is right. JACOPLANE • 2007-01-31 22:22
- Oppose per above. The English translation certainly takes priority. 205.157.110.11 02:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Per AjaxSmack and the party's own website. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 04:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
