Talk:Labor Day (United States)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Holiday-related topics. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

There's probably a better way to phrase this, but I fixed the statement that claimed white clothes are worse protection in the winter. Black absorbs more heat, but also radiates more heat. Black absorbs more heat in the summer, and indeed, white clothing provides better protection against the heat. But black also radiates more heat in the winter, and so white provides better protection against the cold (although grey is the best year-round for protection against mud and dirt ;) ). If you look at photos of clothing for extreme cold climates (think scientists in Antarctica), they will almost always be white for this reason. -Anonymous, October 2005

There is evidence that the US roots for this holiday started in Canada

That's weird, because this is a made-up holiday created by the federal government to deflect attention from May 1 in the United States. Of course, since the independence movement in the British colonies stemmed from the French and Indian War, it is true that the roots for his holiday started in Canada. -Acjelen 15:28, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
"A made-up holiday"... what, as opposed to naturally occurring holidays?
Yes. Obviously all holidays are "made up" and so don't have "roots". -Acjelen
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was don't move. —Nightstallion (?) 11:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Requested move

Labor Day (United States) → Labor Day … Rationale: "Labor Day" is a spelling exclusive to the United States, and the current name may be to avoid confusion with "Labour Day", but a dab on each page should be adequate. The requested name currently redirects to the actual name. … Please share your opinion at Talk:Labor Day (United States). Moulder 03:10, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

[edit] Support

  1. Moulder 03:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. Jibbajabba 22:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

  1. Acjelen 03:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. Will&nbsp

[edit] Discussion

I would rather see the current set of article titles and redirects remain, mostly to keep the subject of this article explicit. This will protect against both well-meaning attempts at spelling correction and general polemicals. -Acjelen 03:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Though I know all too well what you're referring to, having it at Labor Day (as opposed to a disambig of some sort for that and Labour Day) with a note at the top and in the definition itself, both indicating it's about the USA, should be explicit enough. Having it in the article title as a redirect from Labor Day is just hitting people over the head I think. Moulder 10:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

A goal of the Wikipedia project is to be globally relevant and to avoid local biases. Labo(u)r Days are celebrated in many nations (including mine, Australia) and to distinguish between a US and a UK spelling ignores the other nations with such holidays. Here both spellings are in common use and are generally interchangeable. I vote for no change. Will TALK 02:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

I always thought the labor spelling was a case of the US being the odd man out (Canada says labour), so I stand corrected. Still seems like overkill, although the redirect doesn't hurt anything I suppose. Perhaps we should have a disambig page - but then the natural question is, which spelling will that page use? ;) Moulder 03:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Um. I think this is one of those problems with an international encyclopedia. Many people in the United States are unfamiliar with May Day labor observances. At the same time, I can only assume people outside of the U.S. are also ignorant of the unique American holiday. While education is obviously one purpose of a project such as this, I don't think it should be jarring. Perhaps see references at the top of all concerned articles would be sufficient. -Acjelen 04:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC) At least we're not trying to split the article Biscuit. -Acjelen 04:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Oppose because 1). the Labour/Labour distinction is a spelling rather than semantic difference (e.g., the Labour Party (UK) is called Labor Party (UK) in the USA) and 2). the spelling "Labor" is used in many areas outside the USA that learn American English including much of East Asia and Latin America where web access in English is significant (e.g., Philippines). AjaxSmack 07:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] Knights of Labor and KKK connection deleted

Citing someone and his book, with "in his research," instead of specific page and quote, is not adequate sourcing. Plus, "the main reason...more progressive supporters...preferred" are POV and require citations. Also, the edit was poorly written (ambiguous). The parade or the Knights of Labor had a loose connection with KKK? — J M Rice 17:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

-- The Knights of Labor was one of the most inclusive organizations at that time and allowed both Blacks and Women as members. I would be surprised if the Knights of Labor had anything to do with the KKK.

Look at Wikipedia's own article about the Knights of Labor.

Zinn is hardly a random "someone." The "main reason..." presumably derives from the same source. Otherwise, all of the above is true and valid, but note what is said "The original parade ... had a loose affiliation with the Ku Klux Klan" not "The ... Knights of Labor had a loose affiliation with the Ku Klux Klan." Though it's true the Knights of Labor had black and female members, connections among the chapters were as loose as the organization itself. Another example, the fact there are black and female Baptists doesn't prevent racist Baptist churches arising. --74.227.121.198 14:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] why no white clothes after labor day?

Can someone tell me why some people say " you dont wear white after labor day" i have so far had some really silly answers with people being daft and all i want is a sensible answer.

Regards Louise.

I was surprised nothing was mentioned about this, I'm going to add it. Joshua4 03:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merge

Labor Day is a U.S. federal holiday that is not celebrated elsewhere in the world. While other countries have days to honor workers and call them "Labour Day", they are unrelated to the American holiday, with the exception of Canada (as the Labour Day there has the same time of year and shares some history with the American holiday). -Acjelen 12:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

While I agree with your comment I then consider that articles should not be merged. Seperate articles for seperate holidays/events/historical background. Lincher 14:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] cool

this is great it helped me a lot with my hw thanks wikipedia thanks alot!

[edit] Controversy

No excuse for deleting much historical information on controversy over the selection of the date. --63.98.135.196 00:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../l/a/b/Talk%7ELabor_Day_%28United_States%29_f359.html"