Talk:LabelFlash
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is resolution really 1000 dpi? When importing images in Nero, their dimensions are set as if it were 100 pixels/cm (254 ppi). I have ND-4551, DVD+R disc (standard 4.7 GB), Nero 7.2 and best print quality is selected. My screen resolution is 96 ppi, and images are not tied to a particular resolution (they are JPEG, so 72 ppi by default), so this could not be the cause.
- I wouldn't have said it was 1000dpi. I've got a drive myself, and the detail's good, but again I wouldn't call it 1000dpi. I'll have a look around and see if I can find some other info about it. Might see if I can get a good picture of a burned CD too. —Dancraggs 00:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- A burned CD? I thought there are no LabelFlash CD-Rs yet? Or can you in fact use normal ones the way you can with normal DVDs, i.e. using data space for the picture? That would put LabelFlash in a better position as a technology, because in my view one drawback is that you cannot (yet) use it for tattooing CD-Rs - but the latter are exactly what often isn't really used up, so as a compromise it would be good if you at least could use the margin. However they really should also produce LabelFlash CD-Rs if they intend to rival LightScribe.
-
- BTW what may be the reason for Nero not supporting LabelFlash in the US? Did HP make a special deal with Nero for the US market? Is this another superior technology (cf. e.g. BetaMax/Video 2000 vs. VHS) that is not allowed to succeed because someone feels they could make more money with a different one? It seems that LabelFlash is way like Apple and LightScribe is like Windows - the second one is not as good but more supported hence cheaper (about media, in this case) hence more demanded hence more supported etc. Edwing 15:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
