User talk:KyndFellow

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sex tourism

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

KyndFellow is indefinitely banned from editing sex tourism and related articles as well as their talk pages. It is presumed that articles regarding any person, business or service or any accommodation or sex tourism destination mentioned on his websites are related articles, but the ban extends to all articles which relate to sexual services or sex tourism destinations.
KyndFellow, editing under any username or anonymous ip, is indefinitely placed on Probation. He may be banned from any article or talk page which he disrupts by aggressive biased editing.
Content questions regarding the appropriateness of mention or links to the sites promoted by KyndFellow are not addressed; those questions being left to editorial discretion exercised in the normal course of editing.
KyndFellow, should he violate any ban imposed under the terms of this decision, may be blocked for an appropriate period of time.
Sock or meatpuppets which edit in the same manner and with the same themes as KyndFellow are subject to the remedies imposed on KyndFellow. Indefinite blocks may be imposed on aggressive socks. All blocks and bans to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sex tourism#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 06:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi.

Yes, you are banned from Sex tourism and its talk page. If you do it, you may be reverted and blocked...

I think you can still collaborate with Devalover to improve the article, as long as you don't edit the article or its talk page.

Fred-Chess 13:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)