User talk:Krome007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia because of disruptive edits. Vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- It might be helpful to point out, you should not use personal attacks when requesting an unblock. If Harry Colquhoun, is notable. Then provide evidence and sources; not attacks. Good luck with your block. Somitho 08:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- He kept changing the page incorrectly. What am I supposed to do? The moment I tell him he is wrong he blocks me and puts the article up for deletion. If you check my contributions you will see that I dont vandalise pages and sometimes clean them up.
- Then provide sources/references per WP:REF. If he did as you say, then someone will recognize it and jump in to assist. Somitho 08:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- How can I provide sources when I cant edit? I was trying to put pictures in, which he wiped, and I could have also uploaded all the magazine cuttings etc.
- I actually blocked you because of your incivility towards me. Calling me a child, a fool, a prick, a monkey nut, and whatnot in my response to deleting pictures under I3 and removing it from the article the individual is affiliated with was why I blocked.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 09:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am so sorry. I will never do it again. I beg to be unblocked please Ryulong. BTW this is a link I added to Harrys' DVD store which shows some of the awards he has won. http://www.relishxxx.com/
- You are a pathetic individual, banning me again for saying "The only reason why Ryulong is doing this is because we had an arguement last night and he banned me. Only yesterday he was working on the article." This is true. You put Harry's page up for deletion directly after I called you an idiot for not knowing what you were talking about. You really should grow up and stop playing with Pokemon and Power Rangers. I did what you asked and found outside sources to back the article, 3 of them in fact.You should not have admin rights. I wouldnt trust you with the remote control for my TV let alone an internet site. You are in the your in facts and in your childish actions. Lucky I used to know Jimmy Wales back in 1998, I am dropping him an email and reintroducing myself to him.
- Keep in mind that statements like these are a violation of both WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. Whether or not you were right, the fact that you were uncivil in your reply shows that a block does in fact eed to remain in hopes that you can calm down and reassess your position.--Wizardman 02:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am only going to say this once. The only way you can command the respect of people is by being nice, polite, and respectable. In time, people begin to trust you. If you're going to continually make personal attacks towards the other contributors, who are trying to get work done, they will be against you. It's human nature. If you want people to consider what you have to say, you will have to cut the personal attacks. Now. —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 02:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep in mind that statements like these are a violation of both WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. Whether or not you were right, the fact that you were uncivil in your reply shows that a block does in fact eed to remain in hopes that you can calm down and reassess your position.--Wizardman 02:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- You are a pathetic individual, banning me again for saying "The only reason why Ryulong is doing this is because we had an arguement last night and he banned me. Only yesterday he was working on the article." This is true. You put Harry's page up for deletion directly after I called you an idiot for not knowing what you were talking about. You really should grow up and stop playing with Pokemon and Power Rangers. I did what you asked and found outside sources to back the article, 3 of them in fact.You should not have admin rights. I wouldnt trust you with the remote control for my TV let alone an internet site. You are in the your in facts and in your childish actions. Lucky I used to know Jimmy Wales back in 1998, I am dropping him an email and reintroducing myself to him.
- I am so sorry. I will never do it again. I beg to be unblocked please Ryulong. BTW this is a link I added to Harrys' DVD store which shows some of the awards he has won. http://www.relishxxx.com/
- I actually blocked you because of your incivility towards me. Calling me a child, a fool, a prick, a monkey nut, and whatnot in my response to deleting pictures under I3 and removing it from the article the individual is affiliated with was why I blocked.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 09:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- How can I provide sources when I cant edit? I was trying to put pictures in, which he wiped, and I could have also uploaded all the magazine cuttings etc.
- Then provide sources/references per WP:REF. If he did as you say, then someone will recognize it and jump in to assist. Somitho 08:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- He kept changing the page incorrectly. What am I supposed to do? The moment I tell him he is wrong he blocks me and puts the article up for deletion. If you check my contributions you will see that I dont vandalise pages and sometimes clean them up.
Contents |
[edit] Public Domain?
Maybe if you made completely sure you know what "in the public domain" actually means, you might understand why you have encountered such problems. You will need a proper message from the owner of the images you wish to upload, one for each message, confirming that the image is indeed "in the public domain" or alternatively confirming whatever licence they are willing to relese the image under. If the result is OK according to the rules we have to work under here, then you can have your images uploaded. Until you comply with the rules, you cannot upload anything because we cannot trust that we might not be sued by whoever turns out to own the images: protesting "but one of our users promised us that they were OK" is not a proper legal defence. until you indicate that you understand that this is important and stop being difficult, you will very likely have to remain blocked. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 09:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Krome007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Somitho 09:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 23:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Probation violation
Because of your incivility at the AFD discussion, I have reblocked you for 5 days. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policies, such as WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, and m:DICK.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Protection
I gave you a chance to be civil to me last night, however you simply called me a fool and a monkey nut. Now, you've just continued to abuse your editting priveleges and attack me. I have protected your user talk page for the duration of the block on your account. Please use this time to calm down. It's
- Just a biography
- Just pictures
- Just Wikipedia
If you continue to violate any policies after your block expires, I will seek someone to extend your block indefinitely, as I have involved myself too much already.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- I did not ask JPG-GR to comment at the AFD. The fact that he owns a Power Rangers fansite means nothing. No one is out to get you, and I can assure you that no Power Rangers fans are going to be flocking to support me.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RE: Harry Colquhoun
I have read your revisions and changed my vote accordingly. Walton monarchist89 15:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edits to Felicia Culotta
Thank you for experimenting with the page Felicia Culotta on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Sagaciousuk (talk) 02:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hey there! I apologise if you felt my message above was in any way rude. It was a standard template for informing an editor that an edit they made had been reverted on various grounds.
- With regards to the edit you made to Felicia Culotta, that addition does conflict with some policies. Firstly, things must be cited from reliable sources. I checked the link you took the extract from, and it appeared to be a blog. Blogs are not classed as reliable sources under WP:CITE I'm afraid. The link also would have been removed under Wikipedia:External links, as links to blogs are usually classed as spam links. They are rarely reliable sources of information, and often there are much better quality websites to link to. The final, and probably the main reason I reverted the edit, was it had no relevancy to the article. It didn't really fit well with the article, and while it's great that you want to contribute, remember think about what content you're adding to articles - and whether your contributions improve an article or not. I hope this explains a few things - if you've got any more queries - don't hesitate to contact me! Regards, --Sagaciousuk (talk) 03:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Relish links
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Michelle Barrett. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Tabercil 22:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Left a message on your page. I cant be bothered to put the links back in even though they arent spam links due to the morons that edit Wikipedia thinking they know more that the people who actually do what they just write about. Krome007 21:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
