From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent edit to Michael Richards (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user editing a page that experiences malicious edits by banned users that continue to edit via shared IP ranges or open proxies. Since these ranges are too large (collateral damage) to be blocked and user's IP addresses are not visible, edits to this page by logged-out editors of server or shared IP ranges and new users are reverted. The changes can be reviewed and restored by established users. // VoABot II 23:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: " talk 03:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "checkuser has established your identity -- pschemp"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "how can checkuser establish any identity when i am obviously not this person? i dont know what methods it uses but it must do a bit of extrapolating for it to assume that, are you sure you dont just fake results to get me banned? this is all because i was reverting netscott for making large page changes without consensus, and now your banning me because im trying to enforce rules that i read, what happened to WP:Bold and WP:3RR? i was being bold trying to enforce the 3rr on netscott and now i am being blocked for it i dont understand what this is really about"
Decline reason: "You are a sockpuppet. Please find something better to do. —Pilotguy (radio check) 14:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
I'm sorry to see that you were blocked. It's probably not for me to speculate regarding the circumstances surrounding your initial blocking. I don't have the facts. From what I can see, however, you disagreed with the wrong person and that editor tried to "trump up" an argument based on some unrelated incident regarding uploading pictures to get you blocked. I, for one, want to go on record as saying that I NEVER saw you do ANYTHING contrary to policy. All you ever did was disagree with a certain editor who apparently "has it out for you". I think there could be a problem on Wikipedia with arbitrary "infinite blocks" of people. Regardless, I wanted to let you know that your inputs WERE valuable, and that you are missed by more objective editors like myself. Best Regards, Cleo123 10:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
