User talk:KrakatoaKatie/Archive Three

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

tips for authoring: "Edward Thomas Branch"

Thank you for reviewing my 7/21 article on Edward Thomas Branch.

I've edited, deleted the less noteworthy information, and tried to make it use more encyclopedia style.

Please forgive the newbie ignorance. Is there a place/way to add comments for review? Specifically, I started this article/page as a destination link for http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Texas_Legislature&oldid=64934075 which is already tagged for the additional wikilink. But I don't know about linking the two articles.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Also thought this might help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability#Don.27t_delete_historical_persons_based_on_modern_tests

corrected copyright violation: "TackleTour"

Thank you for reviewing my 8/1 article on TackleTour.

I've edited, deleted the portion I cut and paste from the site's "about" section and rewrote it in my own words. I also apologize for the newbie ignorance. I have been fishing for 4 years and this is my favorite resource for tackle questions. I learned about teh site's history by participating on their forums, and asked for permission from the staff before I posted. Thank you for your help.

Possible Vandalism on John Linton Roberson page

I'm sorry to bother you about this, but as you'll see by the talk page and history, this anonymous user is continuing to do what he's been doing. If he'd leave the page as it was until this is settled, I'd revert nothing, but he doesn't, and then hypocritically asserts his right to continue to do so and that I should be the only one to abide by your warning. He's also getting very belligerent and abusive, and is even accusing me of being the subject. I don't know why this is such a big issue, but I think he's proven his bad faith here and documented it. I'm just trying to maintain the work others did, while he only wants to deface the page in any way he can. This is weird and I think you should speak to the anonymous user. lulujannings

Possible Vandalism on Stephen Colbert page

Hi, I just wanted to say that the photo of Stephen was replaced with the Press Release photo from Comedy Central which is more appropriate than the one from Knox College and also has Creative Common licence. Thank you

I was not aware of that, I was trying to update the photo. Thank you.

It wasn't vandalism

See [1]. Thanks. --200.118.131.208 02:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Hope this is the right place. Actually, by the way, its Buckshot6, not 207 etc etc that's trying to redraft the 12 Inf Bde history in accordance with your suggestions... redrafting the material. If I understand copyright correctly, I can write up the history , which is in the public arena, just as long as I draft it myself - and I should think that the UK government would probably agree with the Americans and say that it's in the public domain - it's a government site. Cheers Buckshot06.. I'll sign in now.

Having signed in, drop me a note if you wish... Cheers Buckshot06

Reverting edits on anarchism page

If you read the discussion page you'll see that the sections I removed are considered vandalism by the vast majority of the page's (all but the person who submitted them in the first place) editors and I was merely returning the article to how it was pre-vandalism. Thank you

Re. Reverting edits on anarchism page

No problem, sorry for the misunderstanding. Hopefully the vandal won't be back and people will find the article will be more informative and accurate with his edits removed. 81.79.139.53 10:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi BBB!

Hi Baseball Baby,

Sorry, I wasn't trying to deface the page. I have just recently been turned on to the Wiki', and am still feeling her out. In my defense, I couldn't resist the temptation to add my too sense to what I thought was an unforgiveably innacurate opinion by Miss Stone.

I shall restrict my comments to the sandbox until I learn the rules proper.

Betcha can't tell me what the infield fly rule is, off the top of your head...gentleman's bet?

No cheatin'!

Mike —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mike Christie (talk • contribs).

Reverted

(The author of this section redacted his own comments. If you're interested, you can find them in the edit history.)

Ned Lamont

I did not vandalize the page. I might have put in information which you may not like, but that is not vandalism. You can't keep out the truth just because you don't like it. 75.3.11.87 03:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

My edit to Kepple Disney

My edit to Kepple Disney was not an experiment. There is a link on Elias Disney's page to his father, Kepple Disney, that actualy re-directs right back to the same page. Why should that not be fixed?

Jango Fett

I noticed that too, wondering to myself why they had made the article so short...I mean, surely Jango has some stuff in the Expanded Uni-...oh crap! As a matter of fact, I am using Mozilla Firefox with the Google Toolbar.

I tried to revert my edit too, but you beat me to it, and I added the image right after you. So it's all good. -Dark Kubrick 06:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

unsigned comment

Hey i dont work for the office of fair trading and never had, not sure why you would jump to that conclusion. I was making a change to balance out the information and was in the process of referencing when you tried to stop it for whatever reason. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.92.40.49 (talk • contribs).

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Starting some new articles? Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every biography article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! plange 00:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for the reverts to my talk and user pages. DVD+ R/W 01:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks also for such a lengthy reply. I like your username, have a look at my baseball pictures on my userpage, they are near the bottom. They are newer players and I was able to post them on their articles, J.J. Putz, José Celestino López, and Kenji Johjima. I am really proud of them, they are all Mariners, and I took them at a recent game with my camera rigged up to a pair of binoculars. DVD+ R/W 04:10, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Santorum

Hi -- I wonder if you could help me understand the archived AfD votes for Santorum. I'm new to the AfD process, and it appears to me that the prior discussion on Talk:Santorum is for deletion. I'm not at all clear why the discussion is there -- is it copied from an AfD debate? Anything you could do to unconfuse me would be much appreciated. As it is I can't tell if User:Santorummm is acting in good faith or just ignoring the AfD decisions, though as far as I can tell it's the latter. Thanks. Mike Christie 04:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Yow. That's truly confusing; thanks for the explanation. I'm the one who AfD'd this, and I was wondering if I'd screwed something up (I already messed up on something else already this evening). I will go read your explanation six times until I understand everything. Thanks again for the help! Mike Christie 04:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Vandalism directed straight at you should be seen as a merit. Which is why we have vandalism counters. :)--Andeh 08:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Would you like to be nominated for admin? Then I won't have to wait ages for vandals to be blocked at AIV. Gets boring after a while.--Andeh 08:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Yeh, don't want to waste your time in RfA if there's any tiny reasons to oppose.--Andeh 09:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:ChesterDTurner.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ChesterDTurner.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

New info for reconsidering a vote

Hi BaseballBaby! I have provided additional information to support International Institute of Management article. I have listed the new information for verifying sources and notability at this article's entry . I kindly ask you to support this article by reconsidering your vote. I'm hoping you gave your recommendation in good faith and you will reconsider it in the light of new information. Miro.gal

My RfA

Hey BBB (heh!), just a quick note to let you know I withdrew my RfA at 13/11/10. I appreciate your nice comments :) --james(talk) 11:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 11:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thanks so much for voting, BaseballBaby!
Thanks so much for your support vote on my request for adminship! With a final vote count of (82/5/0), it succeeded, and I'm now an administrator! I am thrilled with the overwhelming positive support from the community, and sincerely thank you once again for taking your time to voice your opinion. Feel free to contact me with any comments/suggestions in the future!
—Mets501 (talk) 03:46, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

IIM

I was really impressed by your post on the AfD page for IIM. Just thought I'd say thanks; so many people delete articles without a second thought and instead you dove right in to find the truth. Keep it up. --Daniel Olsen 05:01, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

  • ditto, I want to congratulate you on your thoroughness on the case. I thought I did a lot of work for it, but yours trumps mine by a long way. This was a very bitterly fought deletion, and plenty of lobbying and dirty tricks all round. Ohconfucius 14:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC) BTW, Thanks for pointing out the AfD on Julian Vereker. Ohconfucius 14:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Rotten.com

Hi -- I see you've started removing some of the rotten.com links, per the village pump discussion. I was thinking of going after these too; to avoid clashing, I propose to start at the end. Just FYI so we don't waste time on the same one. Mike Christie 13:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Stop removing the Rotten.com links. Jerkcity 21:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
FYI, I've left a note with Jerkcity asking for a reason not to remove the links. Mike Christie 23:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
. . . and got nothing substantive in response. I've posted a note back at the original discussion asking for more feedback before I start deleting any links; I can see where someone might see it as a personal attack to have their particular links removed, so I wanted to get another opinion.
Re IRC, no, I'm not on it -- I've been thinking about getting a client. Which client would you recommend? Mike Christie (talk) 10:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
I picked up mIRC and had an initial look; you're right, it's impressive to watch. Re rotten.com; I agree with all your comments. I have been busy mediating and fixing up my FAC tonight, but will start working through the list tomorrow, if I have time. If he vandalizes my user page, I'm sure I'll live. I agree his comments are quite extreme though. If you would prefer to leave this one alone, I completely understand; there's no call to subject yourself to that treatment. I don't mind giving it a shot -- I don't like uncivil behaviour that tries to shut down cooperation, and I have faith that WP policies and procedures will take care of any trouble that comes out of it. Mike Christie (talk) 03:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi; I barely got on to IRC last night but have a little more time tonight. If you have a minute, I'd be glad if you could explain to me some of what I'm seeing. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 00:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi again; I wonder if you could answer a quick question. I looked at some of those links you posted of Jerkcity (talk • contribs)'s edits. Do those warrant a note left at WP:ANI? Some of those are more than just incivil; they're intimidating, as you said. I'd appreciate your thoughts since you have a lot more experience than I do. If you agree, I'll post a note. Or should I ping an admin on IRC and ask them? Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 02:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
I got feedback on #vandalism-en-wp from another editor that it was worth posting to ANI, so I did so. I mentioned that a woman editor found the edit summaries alarming, though I didn't mention your name; I hope that was an accurate statement. I don't know that it needs following up -- the only admin who's responded to date doesn't seem impressed. Anyway, just FYI. Mike Christie (talk) 04:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Greetings

A message to Nurse Wikipedians
Open the message.

Talk page rv

Thanks for the reversion -- Samir धर्म 12:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greater Chennai Police

There have been some additional comments posted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greater Chennai Police which you may want to review. Regards, TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James A Reed

We found a reference. According to this article, Reed's company is one of the largest recruitment companies in the UK. --HResearcher 07:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

someone covertly edited your userpage and added a couple userboxes with some rather objectionable material. I reverted it, but It's something to watch out for. --Daniel Olsen 20:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

adult swim.

you might wanna check out the adult swim talk page. dposse 20:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry!

I'm not sure if you saw this post (below). I tried to get back to you on the other page where you contacted me. I thought I had researched this and it seemed okay, but I apologize for missing what you pointed out to me. Anyway, I just wanted to get back to you to let you know I didn't mean to cause any harm. Sorry to create editing work for you. Thank you for clarifying the poicy for me. I won't make the same mistake again.

"Sorry. I checked the policies before doing so, and didn't find what you sent me about spam. And seeing other commercial links on these pages made me think it was okay. Looks like you have removed everything I put here already, otherwise I was going to remove them myself. Won't happen again. Lesson learned. Thanks."

Paul Arnott and copyright problems

Hi -

I had to revert one of this user's new pages today for copyvio problems - he copied Karen Carpenter's bio straight from the Internet Movie Database. I saw the long string of copyvio warnings and the 24hr block you gave him on 8/14, so I thought I'd let you know he's at it again. I also put a note at ANI so he'd get widespread notice this time, 'cause he certainly seems determined. Let me know if you have questions - Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 21:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I've blocked him for a week now. —Mets501 (talk) 21:26, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

BBC

Firefox problems, thank you. I'll try to be more careful in the future. I still would have chosen to revert to a version that didn't contain vandalism.

Superheroines list

Hey. ACS here. Hate to bother you, but rather than just revert your revert, I thought I'd asked why you removed Barb Wire from the list of superheroines. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 00:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Wangi/RFA

Thanks for your support on my RfA. Give me shout if I can be of help. Thanks/wangi 00:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Nice work

Wow, you and KnowledgeOfSelf were fast, thanks for that. I wonder what I did to garner that friendly message. BigNate37(T) 20:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Kpjas' RFA

Hey BaseballBaby! (Baseball is the only sport I follow, BTW... Go Diamondbacks!)

On Kpjas' RFA, you have voted neutral based on his apparent lack of experience, per Fabricationary, ("usertalk edits are quite low, and as Thatcher131 pointed out, your Wikipedia space edits aren't in administrative areas. I would gladly support you in a few months if you actively worked on those five items you listed above"). In fact, Kpjas is already an admin on the Polish Wikipedia, and has 37,000 edits there, including 2,600 to WP space over there. You have voted neutral based on inexperience in WP space, but these facts clearly indicate plenty of experience in the required areas. BB, you want an experienced editor for admin. Kpjas is clearly experienced. Without badgering you, I urge you to reconsider your vote in this particular RfA. Happy editing! :)--Firsfron of Ronchester 07:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Indiana University disambig

I imagine this is a perennial subject, but after a rv war between myself and another user, the subject of changing Indiana University to redirect to Indiana University Bloomington has resurfaced here. Given your edits to the article, I thought you might want to weigh in. Cheers! -- Merope 20:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks again

Thank you again for reverting my userpage. DVD+ R/W 05:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Adding static IPs to a sharedip cat

Read [[Template:AOL]], the 172s are NOT a shared proxies, they're semi static, standard DSL/Cable Dynamic IPs, they don't change with every page, etc... please either restore the removal of the templates, or change the template to reflect the fact that the 172s are NOT sharedproxies, thank you for your time--205.188.117.71 23:28, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Deville's RfA

Hello, Baseball, and thank you for the support on my recent RfA. The final tally was 72/1/0, and I have now been entrusted with the mop. I'll be tentative with the new buttons for a while, and certainly welcome any and all feedback on how I might be able to use them to help the project. All the best, and thanks again! Go Mets, and I think we might see a Subway Series this year! — Deville (Talk) 01:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

GIen's RfA: Thank you!

Image:Glen thankyou.gif
Image:Glenty.gif
BaseballBaby for your Support!
I I feel truly humbled & honored by your support in my RfA, which closed at 90 / 5 / 0. Thank you! If you need me for anything, just say the word. For now however, just like Mr Potter here:
My mop & I shall thwart all evil :)
IThank you once again my friend. GIen

PS: YES YOU'RE RIGHT HARRY POTTER USES A BROOM! (BUT GOOD MOPS ARE HARD TO FIND!!)

Thank you BbBby! I didnt have too many female votes.... crikey what does that tell me??? Appreciated! :) - GIen 05:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

RFA thanks

Thanks so much for your support on my RFA, which closed successfully this morning with a result of (64/3/3). I will be stepping lightly at first trying to make sure I don't mess up too badly using the tools. Any further advice/guidance will be gratefully accepted. I hope I will live up to your trust! NawlinWiki 11:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC) talk contribs

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006

The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 11:53, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

RfA message

My RfA video message
Image:RfA message.ogg
Stephen B Streater 08:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Teke's RfA thanks

Thank you for your support of my RfA, which has passed with a final tally of 76/1/1. With this overwhelming show of support and approval I am honored to serve Wikipedia in the task charged to me and as outlined in my nomination. Happy editing to you! Teke (talk) 17:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Thanks!

Thank you very much for your support on my recent Request for Adminship. The request was ultimately unsuccessful - which wasn't entirely surprising - and so I'll be taking special care to address the concerns raised by the opposing !voters before running again. If you have any feedback for me, please don't hesitate to leave it at my talk page. Thanks!

-- RandyWang (chat/patch) 13:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you very much for participating in my RFA, which closed successfully today with a result of (62/18/3). I will go very carefully at first, trying to make sure I don't mess up too badly using the tools, and will begin by re-reading all the high-quality feedback I received during the process, not least from those who opposed me. Any further advice/guidance will be gratefully accepted. I hope I will live up to your trust! Guinnog 14:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)}
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../k/r/a/User_talk%7EKrakatoaKatie_Archive_Three_cccb.html"