User talk:Koweja

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pages: New | Changes | Deadend | Orphaned

WikiProjects: CVG | Trek | TV | CVU | DAB

XFD: AFD (Today, Games) | MFD | DRV | TFD | RFD

This is a Wikipedia user page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Koweja.


It is now 08:20 on Saturday, 31 March 2007. Do you know where your children are?




Contents

Welcome!

Hello, Koweja, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair 18:37, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Minor edit

Your removal of star trek nav boxes should not be considered a minor edit. A minor edit is for edits that would rarely be considered contentious like spelling fixes. Cburnett 20:40, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Koweja 04:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TNG

Thanks for putting me straight on TNG navigation! --Steve (Slf67) talk 03:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Koweja 04:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] newly tagged articles

I changed the WP:LGBT list back to fifteen entries. If I remember your concern correctly, you didn't want the articles to fall off too quickly when many are added, correct? But I think we were in a hot flash at that time; after SatyrTN found about a thousand untagged articles, things have slowed down. Consequently, the articles are actually falling off faster at seven days. If you think it should be changed back for a different reason, though, that's still open. coelacan — 20:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

I think when you suggested it they were being bumped off too soon. After Satyr's mass-tagging though, that's slowed down and I don't really expect it to speed up significantly again; we've tagged most of what was left out. Thanks for the input =) coelacan — 21:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] B.R.I.T.T.A.N.I.C.A

You are obviously a careful, thoughtful editor, so I would not ask you to change your vote or anything like that. I would ask however, if you have the time, to revisit the article and the discussion. All controversial material has been removed, and the flawed report of it's prior deletion (it was never deleted), and the encyclopedia reference have been addressed. Sue Rangell[citation needed] 23:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)