User talk:Kotzker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Hello

Hello Kotzker, I see that you made some vary nice modofications to the Skvere article and added some valuable information. Please contanct me to discus some of your changes as it needs to be revised, no one knows better then a Skverrer himslef. You seem to know alot and have a much better grip on the english language them I do. Together we can make this a very nice article.

Yours truly, A Skverer Chusid --Chusid 16:31, 10 March 2006 (UTC)


Hey Chusid, I'm glad to see a Skverer chusid here. I responded to some of your points on the Skver section. Please be aware that I'm not trying to just negate the things your'e saying. I think your input and knowledge of the subject is great. I just think the article should adhere more to Wiki standards.

BTW, are you a BP-Skverer or an NS-Skverer?

--Kotzker 21:23, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jew vs Jews

Wikipedia style is that opening paragraph reflects the name of the article. -- Cecropia 23:01, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

There's a Move request for this page to Jews. See WP:Requested moves. --Kotzker 23:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Shalom. It seems you've missed the entire discussion and saw only a couple of newcomers who added their posts at the top of the Talk page. ←Humus sapiens ну? 23:18, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
You're right. See my comments on Talk:Jew. --Kotzker 00:20, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi:

In looking back over the discussion at Talk:Jew I noticed that you had previously written about using the plural form "Jews" (or "Jewish people") for the article title. Someone recently added a poll on a possible name change. Please take a look. I'm in support of the move for the sake of consistency with other "group" names, and have attempted to provide examples from the List of ethnic groups; some have come out strongly against it. Perhaps you have a different take that would be appropriate, and might like to comment. Thanks! —LeflymanTalk 19:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Opps -- I see you've already commented. My fault for not scrolling down--LeflymanTalk 02:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi! I am russian j'activist Mond. You're contr's is very good! --212.48.202.169 23:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Languages

Hi There! Can you translate my name in what language you know please, and then post it Here. I would be very grateful if you do (if you know another language apart from English and the ones on my userpage please feel free to post it on) P.S. all th translations are in alpahbetical order so when you add one please put it in alpahbetical order according to the language. Thanks!!! Abdullah Geelah 21:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chilul Hashem

A klullah on whoever keeps re publishing the controversies section of the New Square article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.237.28.125 (talkcontribs) .

This is Wikipedia, not "Der Yid". Your edits were blatant vandalism. If you have a problem with the article please discuss it on the talk page. --Kotzker 17:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

A klullah on the writer of this comment. --Daniel575 | (talk) 18:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Skver (Hasidic dynasty)

You added some things about Skverrer minhagim on the talk page there and said you'd incorporate them into the article later. That was 7 months ago. Just a reminder. Would be nice if you could incorporate those things; I had never heard of them, these things definitely need a place in the article. (Until User:Meshulam shows up and deletes it, wildly screaming that it is OR, Original Research. If you want to see what I mean, see HaEdah HaCharedis.) --Daniel575 | (talk) 18:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Family Tree! what a beautiful thing. However, I think it rather belongs on the Chernobyl page and have it as a related link. Also, why did you put it at the top of the page?--Chusid 18:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

This family tree is specific to Skver, showing it only in context to parallel descendants. I do plan to create one for Chernobyl as a whole (as an upgrade from the טשערנאבילער גזע outline I did in Yiddish), but that's a huge and complicated task. I took my cue from the Bobov page, which is why I put it on top. --Kotzker 20:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
So what do you think of placing the Family Tree after Important Literature before External links? I think its fits in there better vs. at the beginning of the article, whats your opinion?--Chusid 23:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kotzker

I didn't know that there were any Kotzker Chassidim that were goyim. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.237.24.48 (talkcontribs) .

And I didn't know I could ever feel so determined to have someone blocked from Wikipedia for a very long time. It is YOU who is the chillul hashem here. Grow up, instead of acting like a baby. --Daniel575 | (talk) 23:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Hasidic Judaism

Please evaluate the changes I made there last night. What do you think? Some feedback would be nice. --217.132.130.193 08:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)