Talk:Kosmopoisk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on cryptozoology and cryptids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

Ahh, this article reminds me of the time I tried to get the "aerocosmic minimum" with ВАКО([1]). But there are some problems from UFOSeti site: "ПРОЕКТ ЗАКРЫТ! В СВЯЗИ С ТЕМ ЧТО НИКОМУ НЕ НУЖЕН!:(" i.e. "The project is closed! Since it's not needed!:(" any ideas? Probally it's because the line from it's wayback archive entry [2] i.e. "Project sponsor: none"

Gnomz007 3 July 2005 17:43 (UTC)

[edit] nonsense

first human travel in time??? "scientific organisation?"

Oh yes it absolutetely is. It looks to me more like a hiking club. I guess a lot of cleaning necessary. I'm not sure if Lovondatr must go through speedy deletion or VfD but it should go. Anyway - Kosmopoisk has got several sites, they've got a book, nonsese or not, so... –Gnomz⁰⁰⁷(?) 00:22, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

That at least is an internet phenomenon. [3] rewrite it like that or delete, I don't know. Dung they are so like VAKO, but for grown kids. –Gnomz⁰⁰⁷(?) 02:27, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Ok I'm rewriting this, I have great problem with some sources like this archive [4] somewhat proving the attitude in academic circles, but just editing out so much claims made in the form of timeline.–Gnomz⁰⁰⁷(?) 03:45, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I have to brace myself, no matter how big is my personal disbelief in all this as pseoudoscience, I must not judge and stick to the rules, this stuff is notable with big Internet footprint. First one crusades against pseudoscience next, he attacks protoscience and everything else beyond his comprehension, so this should not begin. –Gnomz⁰⁰⁷(?) 04:17, 12 August 2005 (UTC)