Talk:Korea Hapkido Federation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	WikiProject Korea invites you to join in improving Wikipedia articles related to Korea.
Korea-related tasks: edit refresh Community: Discussion - Notice board Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventions Navigation: Key topics - Browse - Portal Collaboration of the month Create articles Cleanup articles Assess articles Add Korean text Maintain unstable articles Discuss articles for deletion Improve A-class articles Improve B-class articles Improve Start-class articles Improve D-class articles Improve Stub-class articles Improve top priority articles Improve high priority articles Improve medium priority articles Improve low priority articles Improve very low priority articles Articles to work on: Goguryeo, achieve consensus and neutral point of view. 2007-03-16 Tteok, expand. 2007-03-16 Jeongol (전골), create. 2007-03-16 Science and technology in Korea, create. 2007-03-17 Comfort women, achieve stability. 2007-3-29 Revised Romanization of Korean, include reasonably complete rule set. 2007-03-29

[edit] Prominent Members

Why have people with low dan rankings (3rd, 4th,) listed here? Why is the list so US heavy with even the "Korea" rep being a 4th dan from the States? (No offense whatsoever intended to Master Johnson. There may be a reason for this.) Surely placing a few of highest representatives from each country would suffice. Otherwise the list seems to serve as personal advertisements for US school owners.

I'd like to see the list expanded and be more inclusive of a variety of countries with only a few representatives from each. It would seem more correct to also list the highest ranking people at the KHF Headquarters as the Korea reps.

Any other people like to weigh in on this?--Mateo2006 07:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

No thoughts or changes in regard to the above?

Wording the Prominent Members section "A list of people who WERE or are prominent members of the KHF" could leave you with a list growing far too long, don't you think? If we put all the prominent members of the past here we could easily add another dozen names to the list. Perhaps it should be reserved to present prominent members. Any ideas here?--Mateo2006 07:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

In that case also with an minimum dan ranking, like 6th or 7th dan. Kbarends 10:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)