Talk:Knut Haukelid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (nations and regions): Nordic military history task force

It is now known that the German effort to build an atomic bomb was far from completion, and although this man's efforts were no less valiant, in hindsight they were not as necessary as previously thought.

History research is a field were many people try to get notability by disproving settled conventions. For the most part historians have agreed that Hitler had an advanced A-bomb project. The later 5 years or so some researchers have pointed to information implying that Hitler's program was in no hope of success even with the heavy water, but that has also been rebutted later. My point is that even though the theory of a feeble German project has gotten a lot of attention in later years the issue remains unresolved. Inge 19:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree, this reads more as propaganda.