User talk:Klnorman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Klnorman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some links that can help you get started editing:
And for more detailed information:
- Help pages - the instruction manual, contains everything you could possibly want to know
- The five pillars of Wikipedia - our principles, or how to get on with other editors
- Manual of Style - how to format articles, where to place pictures, and other stylistic matters.
All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask me on my talk page or go to Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. One last thing: please sign your name when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing! --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 22:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:SUP
Dear dr Norman. Could you add a short information about your project involving students to the Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects#University_of_Maryland?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kent Norman
Kent Norman has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 18:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
I have sent it over to AfD for review. No ill feelings, of course, and I'm not even officially voting on the matter. I just didn't feel that this article was given a chance for community review. Sparsefarce 23:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
