User talk:Klafubra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Wikipedia:Redirect

I reverted your addition of misspelled redirects to the list of reasons to delete a redirect, as AFAIK, mis-spellings are one of the primary reasons for redirects. Please point to discussion of this policy change (on the Talk page, maybe) before making the change. Thanks for helping out at Wikipedia, though! JesseW 20:43, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining what ca. means. Learn somthing new every day. Heathniederee 13:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Universal Health Care

Hi Klafubra, I'm just wondering what your sources are for splitting the list like you have. I'm certain that Cuba and the UK are not the only countries with healthcare funded by taxes rather than compulsory insurance, and wonder about the statement that only the first category is truly universal health care. I know for instance Australia fits into the first category as well, and I wouldn't know about the rest of Europe but I think Canada does also. - ҉ Randwicked ҉ 03:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

>>Hi Klafubra, I'm just wondering what your sources are for splitting the list like you have.<<
It's a preliminary split. I only know about Europe for sure. The previous list was wrong too (see below).
>>and wonder about the statement that only the first category is truly universal health care<<
The article says Universal health care is a health care system in which all residents of a geographic or political entity have their health care paid for by the government, regardless of medical condition.
But in Germany and some other European countries, for instance, not all residents have their health care covered by government. So, according to this definition, Germany does not technically have universal health care. Seems pretty clear to me. Klafubra 19:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay fair enough. - ҉ Randwicked ҉ 06:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AfD Nomination: Artificial artificial intelligence

I've nominated the article Artificial artificial intelligence for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Artificial artificial intelligence satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial artificial intelligence. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Artificial artificial intelligence during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion.

== Image:HeartOfPalm.jpg listed for deletion ==
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:HeartOfPalm.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —Pilotguy (ptt) 20:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Brazilian Football Fans.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Brazilian Football Fans.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shyam (T/C) 08:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey -- it's obvious from your note that you took the picture yourself. Submitting an image like that to Wikipedia means that you agree to license it under the GFDL. I marked the image as licensed under the GFDL for this reason, but you should, if you get a chance, add {{gfdl-self}} to the image page, to note your explicit agreement. Thanks! Mangojuicetalk 18:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)