Talk:Klaipėda Revolt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See also Memelland or Territoire de Memel as in the Treaty of Versailles. --Matthead 20:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Please feel free to improve the article, or be a little more detailed than that. Thanks, heqs 15:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

What a great lie is this article. There was nothing like revolt. Simply lithunian aarmy was redressed as civilians. Now even lithunian historians admits it was occupation of Klaipėda/Memel territory. It's ridiculous use as references books, that were published in Soviet Lithuania in 1945-1990, historian R. Žiugžda - was famous for stalinistic style dogmas.--Tarakonas 14:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merger

This content belongs into the Memelland article, it a major part of the history there. It is suffering from too much Lithuanian POV, but this will be straigthened out by facts.--Matthead 02:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Oppose merger. The revolt is a significant event on it's own. Renata 03:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Oppose merger M.K. 18:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Oppose merger. Don't see the alleged "too much Lithuanian POV". Please explain. --Lysy^talk 23:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Oppose completely heqs 18:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Myth

There was no rebellion at all. See [1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vulpes vulpes (talk • contribs).

Well, there was a revolt, but it was mainly carried out by forces from outside, rather than from within the Memel territory. -- Matthead ^discuß!     O       20:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

If regular army from outside is redressed as rebellions and if rebellion is carried out by forces from outside, this don't makes a "rebellion" real rebellion. --Vulpes vulpes 10:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)