Talk:Kitty Yung

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This article is part of WikiProject Porn stars, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to porn stars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

I really don't think this image is "appropriate" for Wikipedia - I find it a bit offensive, but others may be greatly offended by it. Normally such material (remember, this is porn, not anatomical or artistic) would be considered too indecent for an encyclopedia and more the matter of Playboy or a so-called "adult video store". Anybody agree? ( User:Jakes18)

This one I don't feel strongly one way or another about. It is a very low resolution image that not much explicit can be gleened from and seems properly tagged. I don't see that Image:Kittyyung2-sm2.jpg is any more offensive than having an articles pron stars explicitily discussing their careers. -- Infrogmation 06:25, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

If they are offended by it, then why are they looking up porn stars in the first place? (Arundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 12:17, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree there the picture itself is not tasteless in any sense. Also this is an adult topic etc. I mean for crying out loud we have topics about sexual postions and fetishes. I really don't think the picture is over the top at all. --Link25 08:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

There is a (much younger) Kitty Jung credited with several movies beginning in 2003, shortly after she turned 19- how are these two stars related?

Kitty Jung is indeed, a completely different adult film actress than Kitty "Yung". The two are often confused and "Kitty Jung" has actually appeared erroneously as an alias for Kitty Yung - the much more seasoned adult film star.

I also agree with the previous submission. I don't think an adult film star warrants enough attention to be listed on Wikipedia. There are notable exceptions such as "Ron Jeremy" or "Marilyn Chambers", individuals that have earned a place in American pop/media culture. I seriously doubt Kitty Yung has achieved pop culture status, regardless of her obvious fan base. Please understand that I have no "moral" issue with this subject but I do have issue with an entity listed in Wikipedia without enough fame or infamy to be of any value to serious inquiry or research.