User talk:Kirkharry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] ==

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia because you are suspected of using a bot to engage in random and pointless reverts in order to disrupt the encyclopedia [1]. If this is not correct, I invite you to say so on this talk page, which you still can edit. Thank you. Rama 11:15, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


I am Kirkharry. User:Rama blocked me for no reason. All I was doing is reverting vandalism from a bot. User:Rama is a fucking liar. He wrote "Suspected of being a "a vandal who is using a bot") " for his reason. THAT WAS WHO I WAS REVERTING!!!!!!!!


PS: Admins never read anyone's talk pages when they ban someone unfairly. You're just like all the rest. I'd apologize for writing on your userpage, but you know you did an unjustice. So it doesn't matter. Maybe someone will notice before you and de-admin you.

Please refrain from erasing user's pages, this is not polite and can be interpreted as vandalism.
I have checked you reverts and I did not see anything illegitimate about the edits made by the user you were reverting. On the other hand, your own reverts were, at best, cavalier; see this example where you reverted an edit of mine in the process.
You are now unblocked (you are again free to edit Wikipedia). Please make more considerate contributions in the future. Thank you. Rama 11:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


not polite and can be interpreted as vandalism? You had blocked me permanently. I had to do this or no one would read my page. And look at some guy who tries to hide what I write on my own talk page!

I also don't know how I reverted you. I see 70.192.112.34 doing edits that say "robot XXX". Looks like a vandalbot to me. Shall I revert it again? Is it okay with you? I promise not to revert you by mistake! Kirkharry 11:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


I'm still blocked and my userpage was looked. Maybe change the block to a time period. Kirkharry 11:45, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I think it's my IP. I disagree with the sock puppet accusation by the guy with the silly name because I identified myself. I will have to hang up my modem I guess. That will change my IP Kirkharry 11:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

You do not have to erase the content of talk pages of user pages to be read. As a matter of fact, writing on this page only is sufficient.
The robot in question was putting legitimate corrections in interwiki links, I do not understand why you see this as vandalism. Rama 15:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

This is a sleeper troll account and has been blocked indefinitely.--MONGO 22:17, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "I did nothing wrong with MONGO. I warned him of something and now he has been able to take action. I am only a victim of shoot the messenger. The thing is, I told him not to shoot the messenger, but he did it anyway. I am a victim of a flaw in human psychology that hates the bearer of bad news, nothing more. Also MONGO did lots of personal attacks against me with the word "troll"."

Decline reason: "Seems quite likely that you are one of multiple accunts being used for harassment, no unblock"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
I support this block. Who comes back to an account that is inactive for a year and a half just to harass another editor? Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../k/i/r/User_talk%7EKirkharry_7751.html"