User talk:Kgfleischmann
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Kgfleischmann,
I am new as a contributor to Wikipedia, however I have been using it for some time now. I understand and applaud the non-commercial nature of the community and am committed to adhering to it principals. With that said, I am not sure why the below paragraph is construed as "commercial spam." The major PBX manufacturers are indeed driving the application and adoption of SIP, and, in IMHO, the inclusion of most of the manufactures (without links) makes it unbiased. My intention with this citation is to help the community understand the application of SIP within the enterprise market, and viability of SIP Trunking as an alternative to legacy TDM to PSTN interconnectivity.
What in you opinion can I change in the citation to make it appropriate for Wikipedia?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Albert
"The commitment by major PBX manufactures including Avaya™, Alcatel™, Cisco™, Nortel™, 3COM™, Mitel™, Siemens™ among newer players including Shoretel™, Epygi™, Scitec™, Sphere™, and others, has underscored the emergence of SIP as the de-facto standard for VoIP. This wholesale migration to SIP and furthering maturity and acceptance of the protocol has created significant opportunities for next-generation service providers serving SIP-based PBX’es with SIP trunking to the PSTN."
- I agree "commercial spam" is a heavy word and there are some lines in the Session Initiation Protocol article , which need lot of changes, too. But I believe the article is simply the wrong place for your information! It deals with the protocol. So, if you know some IETF RFCs and drafts dealing with SIP-Trunking, feel free to add a paragraph to tell us about them. The same holds for information from any other norming body.
- Your piece of information, as I believe, fits better into Private branch exchange and possibly into Internet telephony. You maybe saw, I kept your link, so that SIP trunking can be found by readers of Session Initiation Protocol . Before writing again, please read the text, I left on your user page!
- --Kgfleischmann 10:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] VoIP
Why did you remove the photo of the VoIP ATA? :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 18:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- sorry,it seems that was an accident.I only planned to remove/reorder links!--Kgfleischmann 20:39, 22 December 2006 (UTC)