User talk:Kgb23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Do not vandalize!!!!!

If you vandalize my TALK PAGE I WILL REPORT YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Out of curiosity, what did I vandalize? --PAK Man 22:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
This is NOT your site whoever you are. BBB? Who? See this:

If you continue to make legal threats, you will be blocked.

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors; instead, assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing.

Clear? --Addict 2006 22:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Bbb00723, User talk:Robotman1974, User talk:PAK Man, User talk:Addict 2006, User talk:Delirium 23:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise the userpages of other users, you will be blocked. Robotman1974 23:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Why'd you steal my explicit warning? AND again: Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. --Addict 2006 23:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Nnapproved.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Nnapproved.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Addict 2006 23:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

Please do not give false warnings to innocent or new users. Also, please see our pages on WP:CIVIL and WP:BITE. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for "sockpuppet of blocked user User:Bbb00723". If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 06:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] unblock

Your request to be unblocked has been denied for the following reason(s):

I see no attempts at constructive editting. On top of that, you are proven to be a sockpuppet of a vandalism only account

Request handled by: —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Do not remove this template from your page.


[edit] by the way: i never assumed ownership of anything!!!!

Addict what are you talking about i never assumed ownership of any articles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[edit] robotman: I DID NOT VANDALIZE!!!!

I posted those notices to get your attention and i do not appreciate insults on other people's talk pages and YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN!!!!

[edit] unblock!!!!!!!!

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "on my other account and IP address i did do some constructive editing before if you had bothered to go far back enough into my contributions, but since i see you always side with what you perceive as "constructive" users i see there is no point in trying. as my last starement i was trapped and frustrated by those users while i know i vandalized it was only because they were accusing me of outrageous things and ROBOTMAN in his own words said he was constantly reverting my edits so of i told them to stop they would never see it so i got frustrated and since i do not know how to report anything i did the only thing i could do so I DO NOT CARE about what you think about me because obvoiusly you have prejudged me to think that i am a vandal and will do nothing else. So while i did not do the right thing to stop them THEY ARE NO BETTER as they claim to be!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It does not matter anyway, nothing will change on this website with a good idea but with the worst follow through i have ever seen. And just so i am INDEED the moral high ground THIS IS JUST A WEBSITE, AND YOU PEOPLE WHO CLAIM TO DO GOOD ARE WASTING YOUR LIFE AND ARE PLAINLY ARROGANT TO SAY THE LEAST AND YOU ADMINISTRATORS BELIEVE EVERY WORD THEY SAY JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE A NICE USER PAGE WITH PLADGES AGAINST VANDALS and to prove my point all of them deleted my notices that they believed were unjustified and absolutely nothing happened to them yet when i deleted their notices that i know are insulting and some of them are just plain without support, the hammer came down and i was blocked WHAT IS WITH THAT"

Decline reason: "Clearly an abusive sockpuppet account. — Yamla 23:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Again, anyone considering this unblock would do well to check out this discussion. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I'm done

i am done here but i have another account so bye bye. --Kgb23 00:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

We'll see. Just you wait. --Addict 2006

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../k/g/b/User_talk%7EKgb23_2d6e.html"