User talk:Keallu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Keallu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Bryson 03:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history

Greetings fellow Military historian! I noticed your contributions to Unterseeboot articles. You are, therefore, hereby, cordially invited to join us at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. We are one of the largest and (IMHO) best project groups here. We not only have lively, thought provoking discussions, we get things done! And it is a good thing too, since there is a lot of work needed in this highly important and fascinating field of study. So look around and see what we have to offer, then if you like, simply add your name to our Members list and this tag:

This user is a member of the Military history WikiProject.

to your userpage, then consider yourself one of us. Best regards,--Bryson 03:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unterseeboot 89

Generally, Wikipedia has a policy agaisnt disambiguation pages (such as this one) which do not point to any articles. Perhaps you would be willing to write short stubs on the different subs, so that this article is not deleted? J Milburn 11:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, you could just rephrase it slightly, and make it into a list of the subs, rather than a disambiguation page. That would probably actually be a better option, becuase, as you say, there is information on the page anyway. J Milburn 11:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, if you are not going to make it into a valid disambiguation page OR a valid list, it should be deleted. Wikipedia's policy comes before the policy of specific Wikiprojects. J Milburn 12:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh, sorry, I didn't realise that that was the case. My original message was that it would probably be best to write articles on each of them, I thought perhaps you were just going to write the disambiguation page and hope that someone would write the articles on the subs. Happy editing. J Milburn 12:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unterseeboot 88

A tag has been placed on Unterseeboot 88, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kamope · talk · contributions 12:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

[edit] Uploading images

Decided to make the reply here so it's easier for you to see it :) I dont, as a rule, put copyrighted images on Commons, because AFAIK Fair Use is something that only the English Wikipedia recognises. Therefore I put the images directly on the English Wikipedia, adding the fair use rationale and tag that you can see on the images I've uploaded. (Feel free to copy and paste to your hearts delight if you find the rationale ok btw) Abel29a 18:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox issues

Please drop by this discussion when you get the chance. Thanks! Kirill Lokshin 21:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Thanks for Advice

Dear Keallu, I wanted to thank you for your helpful advice about fluency in articles related to U-boats, and infoboxes for the latter. I have tried to be more fluent, but if you could be more specific with your concerns, or give an example from within my own work, I feel sure my articles would improve greatly. Regarding the infoboxes - the site where I obtain my information, while being a complete and highly useful resource, does not present much of the information needed to fill the infobox. I am quite new to Wikipedia, and am still learning how to do things, and I find infoboxes quite complicating. If you know of an article or anything that could help me improve my skills in this area, I would certainly appreciate it. Otherwise, I prefer to simply leave them out, because when I try with infoboxes, I usually make a horrible mess. As I have said, I am new, and have only been an active user of Wikipedia for about 1 month. Thank you again, and sorry about the lateness of my reply, Anonymous Dissident 22:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Dear Keallu,

Thank you form your swift reply, and even more thanks for your brief but easy to understand explanation of infoboxes. Your help is so appreciated. I will also use the site you recommended to me. I feel I owe you alot. Because of you, my articles will be greatly improved. Equipped with the understanding of how to use infoboxes, I'm sure I'll be able to create many more articles of better quality. Thanks a million, Anonymous Dissident 23:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello again Keallu,

I have written another U boat article, with what I hope is more precision and fluency than my previous ones. It is entitled Unterseeboot 777. I have done the best I can, using the infobox, and adding some interesting facts. If you have time, I was wondering whether it would be possible that you examine the article, and report to me any faults, errors or inconsistencies you see, aswell as improvements that could be made to make the article just that little bit better. Thanks once again, your advice is gold. Anonymous Dissident 03:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ship infobox discussion

Sorry I haven't been active about this, but Kirill and I are discussing the ship/submarine infobox issue again here. We're talking about the best way to do feldpost number and we'd appreciate your input if you've got a minute. Thanks! TomTheHand 14:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)