Talk:Katirkamam (Hindu temple)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikiproject_Hinduism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Hinduism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
??? This article has not been rated yet on the quality scale.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality, if possible.
Wikipedians in Sri Lanka may be able to help!

[edit] Permission from Hinduism Today editors

Namaste,

We give permission for the entire article from Hinduism Today be incorporated in Wikipedia. If there are more formalities to complete, kindly let us know. The article shall be clearly identified as coming from Hinduism Today and contain a link to the original on our website.

Sannyasin Arumugaswami
Managing Editor
Hinduism Today Magazine
107 Kaholalele Road
Kapaa, HI 96746 USA
Phone: 808 822-7032, ext. 227
Fax: 808 822-4351


[edit] Discussion

I recreated this article from the original Kataragama article as it deals with a completely different issue. That is the Buddhist takeover or a temple that was essentialy a hindu place of worship.

RaveenS 17:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Reference regarding takeover of the temple “This especially is embarassing to many Sinhala Buddhists. Today they consider Kataragama unlike Kali as a national Buddhist god, since the shrine a few decades ago completely fell into the hands of the Sinhala Buddhists (see also Gombrich and Obeyesekere, 1988, p. 99 and Chapter 5). Knowing that Buddha has condemned "billa," they feel somewhat ashamed that Kadavera is accepting "billa" from people, especially businessmen, and exercising harmful powers near or at least not far from the Kataragama shrine. They often try to deny it or to cover it up, when I ask for information about it”
http://ccbs.ntu.edu.tw/FULLTEXT/JR-EPT/jp.htm
RaveenS 20:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


Raveen, stop copying and pasting copyright articles here at Wikipedia from Hinduism Today. http://www.hinduismtoday.com/archives/1986/12/1986-12-09.shtml -- this is a direct cut and paste and utterlybiased.
I will rewrite the article with Hinduism Today as well as other sources as references. But the article is not biased; RaveenS 13:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)