User:Karmafist/RfArb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Case name
(Title for case - use names of defendants)
[edit] Kelly Martin and Snowspinner
- Kelly_Martin (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves)
- Snowspinner (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves)
- Wikiproject:Userboxes
- Dozens of others at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Kelly Martin and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Snowspinner 3
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
(Provide diffs showing where parties other than the initiating parties have been informed about the request for arbitration.)
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
(If not, then explain why that would be fruitless)
[edit] Statement by karmafist
I'm not a direct party, but i'm part of WP:UB, which for all intents and purposes is, and I'm very concerned in regards to recent events. Snowspinner and Kelly Martin deleted several dozens of userboxes in the time around the end of 2005, in the belief that they were justified in doing so. A record number of endorsements against Kelly's actions were endorsed in Kelly's rfc, and a related rfc was moved against Snowspinner for multiple blocks and deletions having to do with Kelly's rfc. However, both rfcs have gotten out of control, but not resolved.
Needless to say, if accepted, Kelly must be recused from this matter. It's my belief that this issue may decide the legitimacy of all processes on Wikipedia, determining whether or not certain people are above the need for working within any structure. karmafist 01:38, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Statement by party 2
(Please limit your statement to 500 words)
