Talk:Karl Wenclas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It's sad that someone would come onto this entry anonymously for the sole purpose of making personal attacks. This, in response to revelations of real corruption among the literary mainstream at my blog and on the ULA's site. Does any action more prove the ULA case?

Wenclas, the assumption that everyone who objects to your flagrant dishonesty and endless self-promotion with so little bonafide writing attached to it must be a literary insider is one of the weakest aspects of your work. I have no quarrel with your exposure of corruption - only your pointless and petty bullying. But go on: delete anything you object to. That'll show your support for free expression. The changes to your profile aren't "personal attacks" - they're a more balanced portrait of your activities than you yourself are capable of making.

Flagrant postings and re-postings of libellous material such as "Quilty10" is responsible for on this entry are violations of Wiki's policy on living figures. Not only does he post defamatory material about a living person, he disguises his postings as "Updating history" and "External Links." This is not the place for a flame war, and I would hope any further violations by Quilty10 would be handled by the admin. Chip 17:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)