Talk:Karl Stefanovic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] See comments
Flag
Portal
Karl Stefanovic is maintained by WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television.

[edit] Content Removed

I removed the below text.

Stefanovic is widley regarded as an intelligent and charming interviewer. His "take no prisoners" style garners both fear and admiration from those brave enough to take the chair opposite him. At play with his two children, however, the mask comes off and Stefanovic is compassionate and generous.
Stefanovic is currently expecting his third child. Water-cooler conversation around the nation has turned to possible names for the baby with many offices participating in sweeps offering small cash and other prizes for those who correctly predict it.

I thought it doesen't really belong in the article when written like that. - Mike Beckham 02:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I think both those paragraphs are really humorous, very funny satire, if only more people read the talk page. i wish i could've witnessed the photoshopped image of karl's head pasted onto C-P3O's head Jivesucka 14:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Quite frankly, these two paragraphs are the most amusing piss-take I've read, on this highly vandalised page.

[edit] Republic vs Monarchy issue

'almost an entire program was devoted to a discussion of the Republic issue' This statement seems to be biased towards the republican's POV as the description was 'the Republic issue'.Serenacw 05:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Seems fine to me. A bit of sourcing would be nice to varify that situation though. - Mike Beckham 06:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

After Get This discussed vandalism on this wiki on 23 Novemeber episode, I think there will be a number of people looking to vandalise this article again - what a pain! --Mikecraig 23:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, perhaps it needs semi-protection again? - Mike Beckham 02:56, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Have requested "semi" again today --Mikecraig 02:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I think the problem is this individual's combination of arrogance and lack of talent. He is simply too big a target to expect people not to satirise the article. Permanent deletion would be a good option.

WTF and huh? why do people write this dribble? --Mikecraig 05:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)