User talk:Kangie/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I predict ur gonna get to be president for 1000 years!

Miltopia 10:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

No wai, I'm here to help build this here encyclopedia!-K37 11:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[1] Lol, you're so skr00d Miltopia 00:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not doing anything wrong-K37 02:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reverted talk page

Hi. Please ignore the nonsense posted by Miltopia. I am currently on reporting his post-unblock behaviors. One second thought: the vandalism by him are old anyways. Please just revert any unconstructive vandlaism on you in the future. Thanks, Vic226 16:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

What? Miltopia is my friend, I don't care if he posts rubbish-K37 23:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

Thnx for welcoming me to wikipedia, I appreciate it! --MOONGOER 04:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

No problem-K37 04:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

ברוכים הבאים – Bruchim Habaim!!! Kangie, Thank you for your contributions and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place and become involved in our Judaism WikiProject. ' Here are some helpful links: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page one of us will show up.  .

Milto LOL pia 12:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• The hell? LOOOOOOOOOOOOL-K37 23:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • It's {{Bruchim}}! Start using it on Jewish n00bs plz Milto LOL pia 05:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
    • How do I tell who is Jewish on the internets?!-K37 08:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
      • We have hook noses and carry bags of Jew Gold...even in cyberspaces! It's true...LOL!--76.81.15.34 03:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

• Eh, most of those are OK. Not too many retarded suggestions-DESU 00:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Snuwglles

Hey ket! I wanna hug ya ^_^ --24.7.194.240 02:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• OMG :3 ^_^ kawaii desu!-DESU 03:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi!

Hello, Kangie, and thanks for the welcome! When you welcomed me I hadn't made any contributions. I hope you like my contributions and decide to let me stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy greeting people here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -Photopeep 12:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

• Loooooooooooool, ty <3-DESU 12:38, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oh, I see. DEAR COREDESAT

Actually, the problem here is that I was made aware of several attempts to link to Encyclopaedia Dramatica from a user subpage. That subpage has since been deleted, but per Enforcement #1 of the ArbCom decision, links to ED are subject to removal and blocking of the users posting them. --Coredesat 09:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Right. So explain to me, where are (were) the offending links that were in my (now deleted) (and the userpage you are referring probably never existed, cause you see, there is this handy tool that shows edits I made to deleted articles/pages) subpages. Also, feel free to check out my subpages at User:K37/Main, User:K37/sigs and User:K37/Userbox. Can you go back and look through the page histories for them, and if you find any, you can screencap and put it on my userpage as a trophy for all to see, sir, if you feel like it. I would appreciate an answer, because I don't feel that the block is justified... I may internet while drunk, and I may do some questionable things, but I don't go out of my way just to violate God's word. I've made a number of positive contributions towards the project, and I sure as hell haven't linked damn Encyclopedia Dramatica in ANY of my user subpages. I would like you to take the time to give me a real answer as to why I was blocked all of a sudden. Please? :3-DESU 10:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stand by while I request comment by the blocking administrator. Sandstein 22:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblocked

I've unblocked you per the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Need_a_block_of_mine_reviewed after Coredesat requested for his/her block to be reviewed. Cowman109^Talk 22:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

• Thankyou!-DESU 22:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I apologize for the inconvenience I caused when I blocked you. I'll be sure to show greater discretion in the future. --Coredesat 22:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

• No worries, thanks for taking the time to get it examined and reviewed-DESU 22:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

For the record, you will be reblocked if you harass Mongo or Hipocrite. They have specifically requested that you not post on their talk pages, so please don't do so in the future (you last posted to their talk pages on the 23rd I believe). Thank you. Cowman109^Talk 03:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

• Ok, I'm not trying to stir up trouble. I'll keep clear of them from now on. Thanks-DESU 03:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

Thanks for the userpage revert, Here is a shiny prize.

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I, Chrislk02, award you this anti vandalism barnstar for reverting the vandal who thought it was cool to deface my page. Keep up the good work, it is much appreciated. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 22:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! It wasn't a big deal, but it is nice to be appreciated ^^-DESU 23:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I know it was no big deal, but I personally feel that people who revert vandalism are often the hardest woring, least appreciated wikipedians. (I know because I feel that way sometimes). There is always somebody to gripe and complain about the 1 revert you did wrong vs the hundereds you did right! Just wanted to say thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 23:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GGFH

I just wanted to thank you for being so understanding about my (wrongly) nominating this article for deletion and then adding sources to it so quickly. The article looks a lot better now and I appreciate your patience. janejellyroll 01:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

• No problem. Lack of sources is an ongoing theme in the metal articles unfortunately :(-from K37 01:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lord Kaos

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Lord Kaos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Peripitus (Talk) 11:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

RE: removing the PROD tag - not a problem....that's part of the process. Much better with the references/citations - Peripitus (Talk) 11:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] For great justice

Oh God no, loooooooool. I only just weaseled out of an indef block a few weeks ago! Despite how funny it would be, I'm gonna have to say no-from K37 21:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

It'll always be there, waiting, for the lulz. —Malber (talk • contribs • game) 02:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I have a feeling it'll be a cold day in Hell before I ever seriously get nominated :P. I'm happy writing articles about barely notable bands that just pass WP:MUSIC, at the moment-from K37 05:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)