Talk:Kamen Rider Den-O (character)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Sword Form's Back

The latest leaked image [1] shows Sword form's back. It looks suspiciously a lot like Axe Form's chest. Not sure if this has any relevance or notability, just thought I'd throw that out there if anyone was interested. Theredcomet2000 19:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

This actually does appear to be a pattern, as Rod Form's back was shown to be Sword Form's chest plate in episode 6. It's very likely that we'll end up with Axe Form taking Gun Form's chest as a back, and Gun Form taking Rod Form's chest as a back. DJ Kidna 20:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually, the toys suggest that Ax Form's back is Sword Forms' front, and vice versa. Rod Form's shoulder pads are Ax Form's chest split into two.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Motifs

Where was it said what animals they're based off? Yaguruma 04:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Toy Fair Japan 2007. Changed the Axe form to the proper motif of beetle as shown in the DenLiner section. DJ Kidna 00:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stop the stupid edit wars

Seriously, decide what it says, and just keep it. Stop freaking changing it back and fourth.

Also, side note, stop adding pointless information, dumb shit, and otherwise irrelevant information. I've finally cleaned the article up, don't screw it up again. Add information thats actually about Den'ou.

Floria L 20:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


I understand completely, however I must ask why so much from the DenLiner portion was removed. The part that showed the dog head and such and mentioned the legend of Momotaro was pretty accurate. But thank you for finally putting to rest the motif of Axe Form, at least with the train. To say that the DenLiner Axe form is a tiger is rediculous beyond reason. Also I might add that it's still up in the air what the motif for Sword form is beyond the legend of Momotaro aka Peach Boy.

DJ Kidna 02:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


Based on the legend of Momotaro. Thats all there is needed. Anything else would be going beyond the Denliner, but rather just talking about the legend. Its all been stated in the forms section, stating it again would be redundant. Floria L 04:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Where does it actually say it's based on those legends? I haven't seen full versions of the pictures, so if someone can point me to those, it'd be much appreciated. Yaguruma 08:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

It was on the DenLiner attacking picture, i think i lost it. :'( Floria L 15:17, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:DenLiner_attack.jpg DJ Kidna 17:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

You need to switch the pictures of Rod Form and Axe Form. And this is getting rediculous, it's already been established that the Kouki train is a BUG TRAIN. According to the subbers at TV Nihon, who I'd assume know Japanese since they SUB SHOWS FROM JAPAN, it says BUG TRAIN. And they aren't the only ones who say this either. But I mean use your common friggin sense. It's got a beetle horn and insect legs coming out the sides. And once more, Gouka is based on the legend of Momotaro, not a phoenix motif. It's plainly and blatently evident by the dog, monkey, and pheasant. DJ Kidna 17:05, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

They use the motifs of animals, and are based off of legends. Although you're right, the train itself for Gouka isn't a phoenix, will remove that. Also, Beetle it is, fixing now. And the images are fine, i told you, if you put them exactly under each sub section, they end up all wrong. Floria L 19:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Alright someone keeps changing the train from Beetle style to Tiger style and it's frankly becoming really really annoying. The fecking article as far as I've been told says BUG TRAIN, AGAIN. So I'm changing it back, AGAIN, and this better be the last time, or else a pox on thee who changes it. DJ Kidna 04:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, scan says Tiger. Floria L 01:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alignment

Can we just pick one alignment for the form pictures and stick to it? I liked it better when they were all on one side, it seems out of wack now. Yaguruma 12:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


Yea, i forgot to fix that. It looked horrible before, and it still does when its aligned like that. Floria L 19:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Biography

Was planning on doing it by an episode-to-episode storyline, but Ryulong made me realize how stupid that was. Instead, how about adding major information and summarizing minor information every 3-5 weeks or so. Floria L 10:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Maybe we could write it in a semi-expanded format after the episode itself airs and then compact it and change the tense used as new episodes air? I think that's why the Kabuto Rider articles are so messy in their bio sections, they're not really that great grammar wise. Yaguruma 14:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

True. Sounds like a good idea, compact it every 5 episodes or so, and elaborate moreso on major episodes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Floria L (talkcontribs) 14:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC).