Talk:Kalu Rinpoche
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Added info
Travelled to Japan, met with Shoko Asahara, lectured to his disciples. June Campbell's book published as "Traveller in Space" and later as "Gender, Identity and Tibetan Buddhism". In the context of an academic study, she describes a three year sexual relationship with him which she experienced as abusive.
[edit] Restoring
I found a very empty page describing only the allegations of sexual assault.
Kalu Rimpoche was, along with very few others like HH Dilgo Khyentse Rimpoche, one of the last "big" masters from tibet. Kalu was held in the highest regard by all of the more important rimpoches. Even if the sexual allegations are true, the Ven. Kalu Rimpoche has made a giant contribution to the dharma. Therefore, a more detailed bio should be here instead of what i found previously.
[edit] Why is June Campell's account missing now?
Someone writes" "Even if the sexual allegations are true ..." Of course I don't know definitively whether they are true, but consider this dialogue with Lama Surya Das (from http://www.dzogchen.org/teachings/talks/love.html):
"I have a question about consort practice. I read an article recently by June Campbell, who was a translator for Kalu Rinpoche. She wrote that she had a sexual relationship with Kalu Rinpoche at the time he was ostensibly a celibate monk. And she was sworn to secrecy. She was told by attendants not to reveal the relationship. If she did, there would be dire karmic consequences. So my question is, can consort practice be sexual abuse?
If it's abusive, then it's not consort practice; it's just sex. It's not practice and it's not a consort.
Could you comment on this particular case?
What do you care about that, actually? What's your real question?
I have a lot of trouble with the kind of faith and devotion that is required for Guru Yoga. And it seems like incidents like this are not isolated.
Right. There are plenty. Too many. So why do we put people on pedestals and hand ourselves over so easily? That's our responsibility."
If *he* is sure that "there are plenty", its hardly reasonable to speak from a stance of 'well who knows whether they are true', as if June Campbell's testimony was of little account. And surely, from the perspective of plumbing the *riches* of Tibetan Buddhist practice, we are all much better off exploring openly and easily that which we find distressing. *Relaxing*, allowing, ... letting the painfull, challenging, contradictory be present.
I found her Tricycle interview (http://www.anandainfo.com/tantric_robes.html) thoughtful and considered ...
Greg Walkerden, 11 Sept 06.
It is absolutely ridiculous to have an article full of enthronments etc with no mention of June Campbell's account. Who keeps removing this relevant material? How can we have any respect for this man's legacy if his followers feel it is necessary to censor his life story in this way? Who is interested in this sychphantic stuff and what does it tell us about Kalu Rinpoche?
[edit] Amazon.com Review
Yes, June Campbell's account needs to be included. But the Amazon.com attempted refutation is the weakest piece of writing I've seen on Wikipedia.
Surely there is some more authoritative and substantive objection to June Campbell's claims which could be referred to? June Campbell has said that the sex began when rinpoche was less than 70. In any case, I would suggest deleting the sentences relating to the Amazon.com review. Johnfos 02:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- I guess there is no discussion on this point and have now deleted reference to the Amazon review. Johnfos 07:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] History Section
This section reads like an advertisement and needs to be revised. In one paragraph alone the word "foremost" is used four times. We have reference to foremost masters, foremost teachers, foremost disciples and foremost center. Citations are also needed to support factual claims made. Johnfos 22:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- It could be a little more polished, but I don't agree that it reads like an advertisement. I am not a student of his or in his lineage directly, but he really did have credentials that are incredible (within the world of Tibetan Buddhism).Sylvain1972 15:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- I've tried to take your thoughts into account when editing the history section. The main piece of text removed related to KRs gurus and not to himself. There is still a need for citations to support what has been said. Johnfos 22:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- I've reorganized the history portion into sections to make it a little more readable, and added some citations. However, I re-added the gurus section - in Tibetan Buddhism this information is of the utmost importance.Sylvain1972 15:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
-
