Talk:Kahuna
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Hawaiʻi, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Hawaiʻi. Please participate by editing the article Kahuna, or visit the project page for more details. |
| NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's importance scale. |
 |
After rating the article, please provide a short summary to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses. To add the summary, please edit this article's ratings summary page. |
|
WikiProject Hawaii priority open tasks:
|
|
[edit] Advertising?
Is it really a good use of "other meanings" to link to the commercial websites of companies selling anything called Kahuna? I'm thinking of removing all commercial links, and just adding a blanket entry saying that "Kahuna" has been used as a product name or brand name by many companies. Anyone else reading this? Comments? Zora 03:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Agreed. Apart from specific copyrighted brand names standing as intangibles asset for a notable product/company (like CocaCola, whose proncipal asset is the brand name) other brand names on product related pages will only encourage advertisers to use WP as an advertising channel. Zora, it's time for you raise the advertising debate at the village pump. I think you have at least one supporter here. If we have a specific guideline to fight advertising it would make life simpler for all editors. It's difficult to use only personal judgement to fight something as entrenched as advertising. - Aditya Kabir 15:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
