User:K.C. Tang
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello. I am from Hong Kong. I don't like meaningless and redundant internal links, I remove them whenever I spot them. Another thing I loathe is "and/or" - those who use it must think that they are being very clever and/or precise.
A good article? From my own experiences, I'd say what a wikipedia reader needs is a pretty summary plus a good bibliography or other resources. Add more resources instead of more details. Help the readers find out the thing themselves.
[edit] To remember
- In many cases the best way to improve an article is to rewrite it, therefore, be bold like hell.
- Avoid weasel words.
- Work the "See also" into the main text, to show why they should also be seen.
- Internal links are for the sake of convenience, they are not obligatory. Ask yourself before you create an internal link: will people also want to or need to know about that when reading this article? The internal links of dates are most annoying: in most cases people won't care to click them (the links of the birth and death years are useful in a biographical article, though: they give context to the life of the subject).
- We don't need to provide a source for every statement in an article, but make sure what you say is at least source-able: you can provide a source for a statement when someone asks for it.
- Do provide a source for any quote, though. Don't attribute words to someone unless you have a source. False attribution causes slander.
- Sectioning facilitates editing, but avoid too-short sections. Divide an article into as few sections as possible.
- Think twice or thrice before copying and pasting the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica. Both the content and the style are outdated - the latter more often than not violates NPOV.
[edit] Motto
The following over-quoted words should be inscribed on the main page of Wikipedia:
吾生也有涯而知無涯,以有涯逐無涯,殆矣。 - 莊子
(The span of our life is finite; the boundary of knowledge infinite. One must not pursue the infinite with the finite. - Chuang Tzu)
[edit] To do or have done
[edit] Chinese linguistics
|
[edit] Chinese culture/history/literature
|
[edit] Hong Kong stuff |