User talk:K. Kellogg-Smith
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, K. Kellogg-Smith, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! The Evil Clown Please review me! 13:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
You should post your article. It look like a good one to me. Even if others edit, they're going to make it better (and vandals are going to be DEALT with). The Evil Clown Please review me! 01:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] External links
Wikipedia:External links should tell you all you'd ever want to know. In a word... yes, they're almost necessary for verifying most statements. Leebo T/C 02:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A suggestion
According to Wikipedia:User page, I don't think you're supposed to have drafts of articles on your user page itself. What you could do is create a subpage, like User:K. Kellogg-Smith/Tip wage credit or something. Then when it's ready, you could use the "move" function at the top of the page to change the name of the subpage to Tip wage credit which would appear in the main article space. Leebo T/C 04:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I read through it again, and it doesn't seem like you can't do it, but I guess it's something to consider. Leebo T/C 04:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User sub-page.
Thanks for the heads up. I didn't notice the note about not using User: page until I was several weeks into drafting the article. I'll look into moving it to a sub-page as you suggested. The draft is taking a while to finalize. It's like writing web pages without WYSIWYG, going back and forth from source code to browser view to check on formatting and acceptable/not acceptable elements and so forth. Your external link note has helped me move things along nicely, though. I hope I can wrap the project up in a couple of weeks and get it posted. Thanks again for your helpful suggestions.
K. Kellogg-Smith 05:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it's definitely a thorough and extensive look at the subject. It's always nice to see articles enter the encyclopedia at full speed! Good luck with it. Leebo T/C 05:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Narasimha Rao
Thanks for your comments on the article. I have been trying to make it into a good article for some time now. If you have time then please evaluate it according to the criteria listed at WP:GAC. I believe it qualifies.--Shahab 13:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)