Image talk:Jyllands-Posten-pg3-article-in-Sept-30-2005-edition-of-KulturWeekend-entitled-Muhammeds-ansigt.png

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Archives for deleted clone's talk pages: /Archive, /Archive2

[edit] Helpme

Could an admin please move the talk from here to this talk page? Netscott 15:20, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

  1. This seems like a ridiculously long file name.
  2. Weren't those comments that you want moved made about the other image?--Commander Keane 15:32, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
This file name spells out a very clear source for this image. The comments made for the other image are in fact the same that correspond to this image. To better understand this change please see: this "Less than neutral image" talk. Thanks. Netscott 15:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
That link doesn't mention using a different file name. The file name is too long. Also, since the discussion pages were about a different image they should not be moved. If you like, you could add a link to top here saying "there is discussion about a similar image here. I (and {{helpme}}) am done with this issue. The image should be deleted due to its disruptive file name.--Commander Keane 00:17, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, if you read the history the discussion pages mentioned were actually about a third picture, the now deleted Image:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad drawings.jpg looking like this. They were moved on the 7. of May 2006 to their current location. About the titel of this picture being too long - I don't think so: It is precise. In any case it is Image:Jyllands-Posten-Muhammad-dr.png which should be deleted because it isn't what it purports to be, and is not - nor will be - in use anymore. (And what's with you proposing to delete a picture if you only want it moved?). --Anjoe 13:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
It's true that the name of this file is long... but given the extremely contentious nature of this particular image it is fully warranted. Netscott 13:54, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
I said delete because images cannot be moved, a quirk in Mediawiki. I meant that the image should be re-uploaded under a usable filename, then this file would be a duplicate and could be deleted.--Commander Keane 14:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Essentially, I chose this extra long file name so that when it would/might be transmitted to others, the file name alone would give enough details for an average person to be able to easily and fully research the origins of the image. I still hold this view but I'll propose a compromise file name between what it currently is and what it was previously:
Jyllands-Posten-Sept-30-2005-KulturWeekend-article-Muhammeds-ansigt.png
Netscott 14:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request to remove image

This obtrusive comment was put on the image page. I removed it, and in the interest of fairness I have posted it here:

[Please Remove this picture to not be among those who didn't care about billions of peoples fellings. Thanks]

Эйрон Кинни (t) 09:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../j/y/l/Image_talk%7EJyllands-Posten-pg3-article-in-Sept-30-2005-edition-of-KulturWeekend-entitled-Muhammeds-ansigt.png_52e5.html"