User talk:JustToHelp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Another Tip of the moment... List the things to do for an article If an article has a number of tasks to be handled that are community consensus, you may insert {{todo}} on the top of the article's talk page, and edit it to make the tasks more visible to the public. Read more: Wikipedia:To-do list Prior tip - Next tip To add this template to your user page, use {{Totd-random}}. Become a Wikipedia tipster

Archived posts:1

[edit] Earth's atmosphere

I didn't just erase, I left it visible on the edit page. And I'll let others rule on how much referencing is enough. What I know for sure is that Wikipedians often remove allegedly unjustified templates, or debate them on the talk page, but not on the main article page. That just isn't done - see Wikipedia:Avoid self-references. Art LaPella 18:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Acumulated Weigth of air

... ist just a pile of data, not an artcile. Please don't post meaningless numbers, that may be considered vandalism -- Chris 73 | Talk 19:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I strongly think that this is not the correct place for the data. This is not what you would expect in a wikipedia article. Is this published somehwere? Can you just describe the formulas for its calculation in the Atmosphere article? I just see no way how the pile of data would survivie any deletion debate. -- Chris 73 | Talk 19:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I know that they are in the page, I have seen em there when i deleted it. Take one step back: If you open the encyclopedia Britannica, would you expect to see a formula followed by 10 pages with data columns? Same here. If you need the formulas, here is the code:

[1] [2] Sum Weight from end [3] Sum Weight from begining [4]

I hope this helps. I know, one of the problems if Wikipedia is sometimes to have people agree on one thing. It does not always work, it is sometimes frustrating, but I think in this example we are still doing fine. Does this help you? -- Chris 73 | Talk 19:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

looks much better now than the data dump. thanks -- Chris 73 | Talk 07:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NRLMSISE-00

Hi, the example you add to this page was from the MSIS-E-90 Atmosphere Model, not the NRLMSISE-00 atmosphere Model. Just wondering if you noticed. --Duk 17:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

According to this NRL page, the NRLMSISE-00 builds on MSIS models.

Yes, you are right, both models are equivalent below 100 km. The NRLMSISE-00 model goes up to 1000km and is heavily affected by solar wind...

I don't know of any on-line version of the NRLMSISE-00, but I'd be happy to email you a compiled version. Let me know. --Duk 04:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)