Talk:June Brigman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]
WikiProject Comics This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Edit the article attached to this page or discuss it at the project talk page. Help with current tasks, or visit the notice board.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's importance scale.
This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by the Comics WikiProject because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove auto=yes from the {{Comicsproj}} template above.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class= parameter in the {{Comicsproj}} template above and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Edit May 17th

I removed the following paragraph:

Too busy to bother drawing three new panels every day, Ms. Brigman frequently recycles the art from an earlier strip. (For example, compare: [1] with [2]). Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this to be lazy and unprofessional.

One of the links is not working, but I did find the mentioned strips on another website. Although it's true that Brigman has recycled a panel from the previous day, this is common practice for many syndicated comic strips, especially for adventure/continuity strips where the readers have to be reminded of the plotline. Bust most importantly, I find that this paragraph reeks of POV with words like "Too busy to bother" and "Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this to be lazy and unprofessional." AEriksson 09:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


         **It may be a common practice but that doesn't change the fact that "Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this to be lazy and unprofessional."


    • "Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this"? Please do not speak for us. You show little sophistication in your knowledge of visual arts by doing so. I recommend your review Robert Rauschenberg or Warhol to see that repitition of an image has reason and is not the result of laziness.67.82.13.55 06:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)