Talk:JumpTV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the JumpTV article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Contents 1 Cleanup 2 possible copyvio? 3 over wikilinked 4 External links 5 Major clean-up 6 External links for online TV channels 7 advert note

[edit] Cleanup

Hey Ragib. I was wondering if you could tell me what exactly you felt needed "cleanup" on this page. Any and all feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Headeditor42 (talk • contribs). 17:20, June 18, 2006

[edit] possible copyvio?

the whole thing reads like an advertisement, really. probably a copyvio from the JumpTv site. Can someone confirm? thanks, ~Chris _{Don't be evil.} 18:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] over wikilinked

There are way too many wikilinks. You only need to link to the same article once. Any more is poor formatting. It's tradition to only link the very first time a topic is mentioned. ---J.S (t|c) 20:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] External links

Does this article really need that massive list full of external links? --humblefool® 01:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

It looks as advertising to mee too. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.32.229.23 (talk • contribs). 03:23, November 25, 2006

I think that having a list of aggregated TV channels makes sense. It help showing the availalbe TV channels online from different places. It is not advertising since all links are toward the Channels official places. ---AhmedG 19:51, November 25, 2006

[edit] Major clean-up

I have removed the entire "Channel list" section as unencyclopedic. Not only did it contain an excessive amount of advertising language, but it served primarily as a link repository, which Wikipedia does not allow. -- Satori Son 20:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Agree, seems to meet consensus and policy guidelines. Wikipedia is not a directory. Wikipedia is not a repository for lists, directories or Advocacy of commercial products and/or websites. NPOV requires views to be represented without bias, this applies not only to article text, but to companies, company lists, channel lists, products, external links, or any other material as well

Have reverted reinsertion of list back to consensus.--Hu12 03:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] External links for online TV channels

Having all the links embedded within Wikipedia may not be the best case scenario. If there is an outside link or article that contains a list of channels that are available online based on different ethnicities, then one external link would suffice and would be relevant to this article. —Ag imedia 01:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC).

Yes, that makes sense. Does anyone know of a single link that provides a complete channel listing? We just can't go back to the mess we had before. -- Satori Son 01:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] advert note

Hu12, shall we remove the advert note? it does not sound like advert to meAg imedia

Removed, much better. good work. Especialy like the addition of the History section. --Hu12 22:52, 19 January 2007 (UTC)