Image:Juka.JPG

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image
File history
File links

No higher resolution available.

Juka.JPG‎ (300 × 436 pixel, file size: 17 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

This work is copyrighted and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket fair use categories listed at Wikipedia:Fair use#Images or Wikipedia:Fair use#Audio_clips. However, it is believed that the use of this work in the article "Jusuf Prazina":

To illustrate the object in question
Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information
On the English-language Wikipedia ([1]), hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation ([2]),

qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Fair use and Wikipedia:Copyrights.

To the uploader: this tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use. You must also include the source of the work, all available copyright information, and a detailed fair use rationale.

I think this should fall under fair use. The only pictures of this individual available are all from one magazine article from several years ago. Despite his historical significance (well, relevant to the time and place) this is one of the only pictures one can find. With the nature of wikipedia and this image, there really shouldn't be any problem. I cannot see any trouble arising with the magazine in question ("Dani"), which presumably holds the copyright - especially if they're mentioned and linked to.

File history

Legend: (cur) = this is the current file, (del) = delete this old version, (rev) = revert to this old version.
Click on date to download the file or see the image uploaded on that date.

(del) (cur) 18:20, 12 May 2006 . . Live Forever (Talk | contribs) . . 300×436 (17,858 bytes) (I think this should fall under fair use. The only pictures of this individual available are all from one magazine article from several years back. Despite his historical significance (well, relavent to the time and place) this is one of the only pictures )