Talk:Judicial interpretation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why on earth does this redirect point to 'judicial activism'? The two words are not the same at all: activism is a form of judicial interpretation.

• This page needs an article to go with it. The articles that it links to can form part of it. - Matthew238 00:27, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Removed cat

I removed [[Category:Supreme Court of the United States|J]]. While this relates to the Supreme Court, it is not exclusive to the Supreme Court.

Epolk 23:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Intentionalism?

I came here looking for somethign like Intentionalism. It was somethign about trying to interpret the intent of law. Mathiastck 14:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] circular definition

The article begins with this:

Judicial interpretation is a theory or mode of thought that explains how the judiciary should interpret the law,

This is circular! To understand the phrase "how the judiciary should interpret the law", one must FIRST know what "the judiciary...interpret[ing] the law" means. But that is just what the sentence purports to explain. Michael Hardy 04:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)