User talk:Jsliwinski

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome, Jsliwinski, to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages. The Wikipedia directory is also quite useful.

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automagically add your name and the time after your comments.

To basically understand the principles and rules governing Wikipedia, you should take a look the Five Pillars that underlie all rules here.

Finally, here are some jobs that you can work on in your spare time:

Here are some tasks you can do:

Hope to see you around the Wiki! And if you have any questions whatsoever, or would just like to drop me a note, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Bratschetalk | Esperanza 02:54, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Malingering

Hiya,

I take your point about the other neuropsych tests, but in theory ANY neuropsych test could be used to pick out malingering and you could just as easily list all of them or say link to the main article on neuropsychological testing. For example if someone's had a small stroke in the left temporal lobe and they're failing all their vision tests yet are still able to drive (and undergoing litigation!) you would probably be suspicious. So you could say that Benton's Judgement of Line Orientation could help you there. I'm no expert however so if you've got the references that refer to these tests I would find it useful for my own practice!

Thanks

--PaulWicks 09:55, 14 February 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Absinthe

What is the basis of your change to the absinthe article "although there is evidence of absinthe in several ancient cultures?" Alanmoss 21:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

It is discussed in published texts and articles... There are several FAQs around the web that mention it as well, some which cite reliable information. Archaeological evidence (artifacts). --Jsliwinski 21:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Could you give 1/2 citations, please. As I see it, your changes to the absinthe page are unjustified. However if you can prove me wrong, I will happily say so. At the moment your changes look like vandalism. Alanmoss 21:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

There is no intent to vandalize the absinthe page, rather, there is an intent to offer a more inclusive discussion of the origins of the modern form of absinthe. The best place to look would be "Absinthe: History in a Bottle" in the chapter on its history. I don't have it in front of me, but there is a short discussion of how the modern form is descendant from a long history of liquors and "treatments." --Jsliwinski 02:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Another source, however, it lacks citation... http://www.sinfusion.com/absintheparty/history.html --Jsliwinski 03:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)