User talk:Jones s a

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your edit to Fifi Box

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Gogo Dodo 08:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Fifi Box, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo 08:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Dude, I take your point about the changes to the Fifi Box page. However why do the changes I made to The Cage get removed or reverted? James often calls Mike Fitzpatrick 'Fisty' or 'Fistular'. This is not offensive and is factually correct so why the changes?

Very well, reinsert that into the article. One problem with reinserting it though is that it's unverifiable. -- Gogo Dodo 17:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You edit to Ricky Ponting

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! Gizza^{Chat ©} 02:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I will try to find a reference for this entry as from memory it was an atrocious decisionJonesy 02:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ben Cousins

I have reverted an edit of yours to Ben Cousins which added what could be construed as defamatory information. You provided no citation whatsoever for what you added. I refer you to our policy about biographies of living persons:

"Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just highly questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space.

...

Editors who re-insert the material may be warned and blocked."

If you wish to add that information to the article, you must provide a source for the information, otherwise you will continue to be reverted. - Mark 02:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

It sure is an eye-opener. If it's true. Wouldn't surprise me if it was, really. I've been keeping my eye on the Ben Cousins and Anthony Callea articles regularly for the last couple of weeks to make sure we comply with BLP. We don't want lawsuits coming our way. :) - Mark 07:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)