Talk:Jonny Wilkinson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

	Jonny Wilkinson is part of WikiProject Rugby union, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to Rugby union. If you would like to participate, you can edit Jonny Wilkinson, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and view a list of open tasks
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Jonny Wilkinson was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake. Date of review: 25 August 2006

[edit] GAC

This article was graded on 7 criteria:

1. Well-written: Neutral
2. Factually accurate: Pass
3. Broad: Pass
4. Neutrally written: Neutral
5. Stable: Pass
6. Well-referenced: Fail
7. Images: Pass

unfortunately, the article fails. It is not well referenced, with 3 references at the very top, and 2 at the very bottom, and none for most of the article. There are instances of weasel words and phrases, knocking the neutrality rating to "Neutral", and many rugby terms and organizations are not defined or linked, leaving anyone without knowledge of rugby completely in the dark. The article can be cleaned up, however, and I recommend resubmitting it to GAC, posibly after a Peer Review. --PresN 18:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC)