Talk:Jon Atack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jon Atack article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

What level did Atack reach in Scientology before he left? I've read that it was OT III, but I don't have a suitable source for this. -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Atack's book

Incredible. Just incredible. How can a person spend so much time, effort and money, understand so badly and then write a book that presents his misunderstandings? Incredible, like spending 10 years studying math, completing calculus and not being able to say 12 times 12 = 144. Terryeo 05:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry, Terryeo, did you have something to say that was relevant to the writing of the article? Perhaps you should look into getting a blog; by the law of averages, someone out there on the Web would almost certainly be interested in your personal opinions. -- Antaeus Feldspar 00:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)