Talk:Johnny Depp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

he's not dead

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

This article has been rated as b-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] See comments

This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

[edit] Biography

Johnny Depp may have been in Jacksonville, FL (I'm not sure). But he was mainly raised in Miramar, FL.

My sources include:
http://www.myspace.com/official_johnny_depp (Note the biography and his High School, considering he moved there in 1970 when he was 7 or so.)
http://www.johnnydeppfan.com/interviews/gq.htm
http://www.johnnydeppfan.com/interviews/tvguide.htm
http://features.yahoo.com/webceleb/depp/
http://www.johnnydeppnow.com/
http://www.funtrivia.com/en/Celebrities/Depp-Johnny-13891.html

--Jearsh 21:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good article

I think this should be a good article candidate.User:alfredosolis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Johnny Depp article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

and the drug-fueled gonzo-journalist Hunter S. Thompson in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

I'm pretty sure the character is Raoul Duke, and the book was written by Hunter S. Thompson, but I didn't want to change it without comparing notes.

The same mistake is made when refrencing the Rum Diaries.

-- Evilio 19:57, 15/09/06

Yes, that seems right to me and is consistent with other articles. I fixed it. --- bethenco 18:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

He began smoking at age 12 and has not stopped to this day, claiming smoking, drinking and sleeping are the three best things he does.

uh, is this one real? I doubt it, but it seems possible.---Mihoshi 03:08, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I highly doubt it and with no evidence given by a suspect user I reverted it.--The Grza 07:11, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)

It is true, I can say it as a Depphead. (User:Vivi Sparrow)

Please cite the source instead of simply insisting that it's true.--The Grza July 5, 2005 01:45 (UTC)

Raoul duke is hunter thompson. Your splitting hairs! It makes it more easy for the lay person to understand to say he played Hunter Thompson. Or say Alias hunter thompson.

[edit] Tattoos

Removing metion of tattoos as it would seem that is not at all certain. I initially removed them here [1]. Some claims [2] they were all removed and another claims [3] he has 11. Unless someone can show that he in fact currently has tattoos, then I'll keep removing mention them. Cburnett 19:30, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC) he does have tattoos you can see them when he wears non sleeved shirts. and his tattoo DOES say WINO forever, its a fact

[edit] Movies

Some movies are missing, refer to the IMDB page.

Yes, I removed some to make it a selected Filmography. It's still a bit long, but all of them were relatively significant so I left it a bit extensive. Listing every bit part he held is going overboard. --The Grza 00:52, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

one of the best films that johnny has ever done has got to be benny and joon because it proves that you don't need speech to get a good film! from a depphead :-)

he does indeed have 11 tatoos, including some on his legs, chest, and arms

May I ask what is the point of choosing to display selected filmography only? I think it's important to show that person's full body of work, and not just list the obvious. Nikki88

[edit] Removal

I just caught the fact that a large section of the page was removed on May 17th and I put it all back in. I assume this was just vandalism gone under the radar, but if not, would someone fill me in on the reasoning?--The Grza 07:33, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

He had the lead role in Arizona Dream. THht's not on the list.

[edit] Ancestry

I heard that Johnny Depp is of Lebanese descent. Does anybody know his exact ancestry? Regards, --Gramaic | Talk 05:11, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

It's pretty well known that he's part-Cherokee. I read in an article that he's also of Irish and Gertman descent.

I just looked at his family tree here and here and I can't see any Irish name at all, only English/British so I removed that if anyone has other info on the Irish please post the source here. There is apparently a lot of info on his ancestry in the book "Johnny Depp, A Kind of Illusion" . Arniep 22:30, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

I once read that the Depp name is French, so he may have French ancestry as well. Gerkinstock 9 October 2005

Depp is NOT a French name. 85.138.1.71 14:23, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually it is- many American Depps were originally French Deppes and Dieppes. Arniep 00:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

According to genealogy.com, a widely respected genealogy site,

"Johnny Depp's ancestry, much like his film career and famous good looks, is something of an exotic mix - French on his father's side and Cherokee Indian on his mother's".

See http://genealogy.com/famousfolks/jdepp/ for more info. MissTree 08:13, 22 March 2006

Johnny Depp is reported to have said that he's 1/3 of German ancestry: here. Does anybody know more about that? MikeZ 12:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

On his infamous interview on Inside the Actor's Studio, the only ethnicities he states are German, Irish and Cherokee. He's never mentioned French ancestry, nor has anybody in his family. This is why I have deleted the "French huguenot from Virginia" comment because I don't think it qualifies as being accurate, plus it came from an unauthorized bio book, which are hardly ever right about details. And as a longtime Depphead myself, French ancestry is not a popular belief by fans either. As for having Lebanese extract, that's for sure not true, where did you hear that? Have you seen his parents? I think when it comes to editing actual pages, we should go by fact and what that person has publicly stated, rather than what someone read in an unauthorized book; so please refrain from the edit war. Nikki88 7:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Nikki88, I reverted that change the first time it was made because it was a deletion of apparently cited text, without an edit summary, by an anonymous user. All of those are typical indications of vandalism. Thanks for using the edit summary the second time you added it! -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 01:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing what I needed to do to my attention, Jim. I wasn't signed in during my edits, I apologize. Nikki88 10:47, 6 Nov. 2006 (UTC)

I don't understand the deep interest of Americans for ancestry: it's probably because they are a mixed people. However, don't you think it's enough to say that Depp is European and Cherokee? This would be absolutely right and could end every controversy! Val

[edit] Batman

"Some hardcore Batman fans consider him a good candidate for the next sequel to Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins, currently titled Batman 2 or Batman: The Killing Joke." A good candidate for what? For the title role?

That should be removed. It's referring to the Joker, but Depp's name hasn't come up at all in official casting discussions. No-one's has, really.

And "The Killing Joke" for the title is pure speculation. --Marcg106 03:04, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gun that killed Hunter Thompson...

"Depp reportedly owns the gun and ammunition that was used in the suicide of Hunter S. Thompson"

this allegation is pretty heavy, and i think it needs a reference for support. just adding the word "reportedly" doesn't cut it (who reported it?). doing a google search for "johnny depp provided gun hunter thompson" returns this article on wikipedia first, and then a bunch of articles that make no mention of this particular assertion. i removed it for now, but am totally open for it's later addition provided we have some clarification... Nic.stage 17:26, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

someone re-inserted the unsourced claim that depp owns the gun that killed thompson. i chose to remove it instead of adding "allegedly", because i can't find any information supporting this claim anywhere. that is a serious claim to make and i believe it needs attribution. please clarify why it should be in the article if you feel it should be. --Nic.stage 01:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Depp and Kerouac

Depp is a great fan of the writer Jack Kerouac. He reads a section from 'Visions of Cody' on the tribute CD 'Kicks, Joy, Darkness'. He writes one of the blurbs for Douglas Brinkley's edited Kerouac journals (Windblown World).He paid, I believe, $11,000 for Kerouac's raincoat.

[edit] Nominations

Are two entire lists of nominations necessary? Personally, I prefer the second of the two in format, but I'm unsure of policy regarding nominations, so I'm leaving it but drawing attention to it. The Zaniak 12:25, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

woahhhhh theres some pretty weird comments in here EB!!! does he really smoke and drink and whatnot?!?!?! what a loser. but o well he's still hott. lol bye! <3 urckle

[edit] Depp's daughter

For the avoidance of doubt, since this is being regularly changed:

The Internet Movie Database, johnnydepp.com, USAToday, The Observer and Sky TV all give Depp's daughter's name as Lily-Rose rather than LilyRose or Lilyrose.

Please can contributors cite sources when asserting the name to be something different and thus avoid having the edit reverted. Many thanks. ➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 21:12, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

The article stated that his great grandmother was full cherokee, making him 1/4 native american. However, this is blatantly impossible. Instead, it makes him 1/8th native american. If his grandmother, not great grandmother was full cherokee, then that would be correct.

Judging from Johnny's tattoo on the left side of his chest, it visibly reads "Lily-Rose". So therefore with the hyphen is more than likely the correct spelling. Nikki88 12:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Depp's son

The article lists his son's name as "Jack John Christopher Depp III" How can Depp's son be a "the third" if his name is not IDENTICAL to his father and grandfather which do not have a Jack in their name? If he is called Jack to differentiate him, then perhaps that portion of the name should be enclosed in quotes?

  Jack is his nickname. His name is John Depp, but Depp calls him Jack.

His birth name is Jack John Christopher Depp III - continuing in the family tradition. Johnny's father is John Christopher, and Johnny himself is John Christopher II, making his son the third. Johnny added the name Jack to his name, and they call him Jack. I was never aware of the fact that you couldn't add a name to the beginning of a person's title. Nikki88 12:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 1/4 cherokee does not add up

His father is also part cherokee so 1/4 is about right. Arniep 23:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean "his father is also part cherokee"? of course his father is part cherokee that is where he gets it from. That's why he is as well. I guess, since his father is part cherokee you can make him whatever percentage cherokee that you want? This is about percentages. These are technical terms, "about right" is not good enough to put in an exact percentage. Think about it. It is incredibly simple to deduce! His great grandmother was cherokee making her children (Johnny depp's grandparents on his dads' side) 1/2 cherokee, their children (Depp's father) 1/4 cherokee, and Johnny Depp 1/8th cherokee. My grandmother was norwegian so I'm 1/4 norwegian, if she had been my great grandmother I would be 1/8th norwegian (by your standard for Depp, we are all double our actual ethnicities in terms of composition) All I'm saying is that this is simple math, and you should not write something like that which makes the whole article look bad, because anyone who has passed 4th grade level math will say "That doesn't add up right!"

Sorry you need to re-read it. His great grandmother through his mother was Cherokee (1/8 of his inheritance) and his father is also part Cherokee. Arniep 14:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

OK, but it doesn't make him 1/4. His dad could be 1/20th. Just say partial instead of picking an exact figure which you can't back up. Doesn't that make good sense? Partial, is a very vague term.

Not to mention there's many "stars" whose agents just tell them to claim they have "native American" blood because it makes them jazzy and trendy in today's multiculturaloid world, see the (in)famous case of Shania Twain. So, by know, who knows. I doubt he'll submit himself to a simple mitochondrial DNA test to know for sure. Yeah, the story is kinda weird. You can only find it weird when people claim to not really konw where their own family names come from, and what exact race their parents grandparents were. As said, claiming it, is great source of media coverage, who can konws if it's honest or not, particularly with all the maths that just don't had up, every magazine claims a different story - one thing's for sure, they can't all be true.

I felt the need to say something about your accusations. You stated that agents often tell their clients to claim a certain ethnicity for popular cultural reasons. Well, not in Johnny's case. Johnny first got his "Indian head" tattoo at the age of 17, honoring his family and heritage. So that goes back before he was a big "star". Also, he's stated in several interviews over the years of his memory of seeing his maternal grandmother's (who would be 1/2 Native) toenails, he said she never cut them, and they reminded him of cashews. It was a Native tradition or custom. All this dates when he was a child, not as a famous adult. Second of all, I doubt when it comes to his father's Native heritage, they could do such deep research to configure such a small percentage as 1/20... the family comes from Kentucky; most Americans, including myself, are too diverse and mixed in their heritage to have exact percentages, it's just not a possible thing to do when you come from the US. As for him being 1/4 or 1/8, like I said, who can really tell; maybe he's 1/6! All you need to know is that he's a significant amount of Native American, Cherokee to be exact, or maybe even a bit of Shawnee, Choctaw, or Navajo. You never know. Nikki88 01:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Platoon

Shouldn't his early career description mention he was in Platoon? It's quite a major film from 1986, seems one could slip it somewhere between Elm Street and Cry Baby. I know he didn't have a big role, but it could get a mention. Pipedreambomb 06:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I've added it in.--SGGH 09:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This article

Needs major, major help. I formatted it into the proper style, but the "Career" section is a mess, the early life is too long and needs to be re-shaped, and the personal life still reads like trivia. Editors spent too much time wondering if Depp was 1/4 Cherokee, and not enough checking out the rest of the article and bringing it to at least an average standard. Also, citations much needed all over the place. Mad Jack 16:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Also, the "Awards" section - I propose either junking it all together (maybe mentioning the major awards in the text of the article) or moving it to a separate page. Mad Jack 16:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

His main picture should not be a character from a movie, it should be as he actually is outside of his roles. H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 03:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tiscali

Tiscali is a semi-reliable kind of source, but OK. The question is, what does it prove? I couldn't find anything on the first page about Depp being Cherokee or Native American. The source would actually have to call Depp "Cherokee" or "Native American", not his great-grandmother, for the cat to be on there Mad Jack 05:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox

The infobox to which you changed it tells us absolutely nothing about Mr. Depp. I imagine the official actor infobox I used is set out that way for a reason, and for the same reason simple biography infoboxes are not used for any other actor; and, it could just be me being soft, but I don't understand any of the reasons you give against it, bar the picture size one, about which I can do nothing, unfortunately. --82.42.124.247 11:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, it was used in Lindsay Lohan, which is a featured article, and used in plenty others. I simply do not want another link to the IMDB. One is bad enough. That site, beside being grossly inaccurate, has little to offer. Height is unencyclopedic and is never mention in articles. Picture size is too small. All in all - just a worse infobox. The infobox I used has the exact same info - birth place/date, along with smaller text for relevant roles, which is good, because in his case there are more and we can include them. Unless there's some kind of policy regarding this infobox's uses, it's pointless and should not be here. Mad Jack 15:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

There was no infobox before I put one there, and when I decided to, I checked Wikipedia's stance on this. There are standard templates used for all different articles, and, rather sensibly I think, I chose the actor one. If you think your's is better, then by all means submit it to the infobox Wikiproject and try and get it approved, but until then, as one of the points of Wikipedia is to collect information in a standardised manner, I believe the infobox I used is correct --82.42.124.247 15:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

This is not "my" infobox. It's a standard biographical infobox. Mad Jack 16:35, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

This is getting boring now; I'm not going to repeat myself, safe to say an biography infobox is not an actor infobox. There's a different one for a reason. --82.42.124.247 20:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Again, I don't know who "approved" this infobox but height information has been deleted from articles with a vengeance everywhere I've seen. There is no reason on earth to put in another IMDB link. If you really don't like the one that's up now - even thought it's the one up at Featured Article Lindsay Lohan - you can change it to a blander one like the one over at Kevin Spacey. But I will be deleting the IMDB link there and the height info until someone can tell me why not. Mad Jack 20:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

I was never trying to be awkward with this, I just assumed my placing the infobox which, incidentally, I found here; Template:Infobox_actor, on actors' articles I came across would do nothing but help. I agree that there is no need for another IMDB link, however, I think height should stay. It's one of only a couple of facts you couldn't find be reading the first couple of sentences of the article. --82.42.124.247 22:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, heck, I just changed that part on the infobox actor template - I removed the offending bits from the template itself! (Thanks for the link - I would have done so earlier but was unable to find it). I'll see if I can further change it later - no time right now. As for height - I've seen it removed from entries practically every time it was added. I'd venture it's because height technically "changes", and is otherwise an unencyclopedic bit, but I am not sure. Mad Jack 23:22, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ironic?

Why, if the person your character is inspired from, then plays your father, is it considered ironic? Because it's not ironic! So why does the article say that. --Joeblack982 04:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox pic

After reading the policy, the guidelines, and discussions about the use of film images in bios[4][5], I've concluded that this article is indeed violating what we should be doing by using an image from Pirates. Please read those discussions before arguing your point here, 'cause it's probably already been covered. CovenantD 20:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Reading the links you provided, it is clear to me that you are wrong and the main image should not be removed. Dionyseus 21:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Would you explain your rationale? CovenantD 21:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Did you read the entire section in the second link you provided? Dionyseus 21:58, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes. I found this part very compelling - Example: In the section on screen roles, it would be fair to show a screenshot of an actress in a movie, because it would be impossible to obtain a free-image of her in that movie. But as the "main image", the point of the image is to illustrate the actress, and it would not be impossible to get a free image showing the actress. So it's quite possible that an article would have several justified fair use images showing an actress, but no "main image". CovenantD 23:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

And read the responses. There's no policy that says fair use images cannot be used as main images. Dionyseus 08:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Stop insinuating that I haven't read the articles and discussions that I linked. That's pretty offensive and patronizing. CovenantD 08:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sweeny Todd

The link in the filmography goes to the page for the character. Could someone change it so it goes to the film? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.231.189.189 (talk • contribs) .

Done. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 04:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Images

I've checked with an admin whose judgement I trust, and he confirmed by interpretation that use of these images violates Wikipedia fair use policy. "Promo photos of a movie are not acceptable save to illustrate an article on that movie" As such, I'm removing them. CovenantD 17:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

This article needs pictures Johnny Depp is probably the most famous actor in America.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.202.235.194 (talk • contribs).

Then some proper fair use images need to be found. CovenantD 01:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

If you are so smart you find them.I mean I think every picture is not fair use.

[edit] Let's put this page under protection

There have been about a dozen women putting their names into the article, saying things like they've dated, dating or even had a marriage proposal made by Johnny Depp. Yeah I know he's a ladies man, but still most of the times it's a load of bull. DaffyDuck619

[edit] False wife's names

Ladies, PLEASE stop putting your name as Johnny Depp's spouse. It is not entertaining. Frecklegirl 11:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I second that. Nikki88 1:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

This goes to all you boys out there too Zerocannon 05:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ancestry revisited

There appears to be some dispute about whether this reference should remain in the article:

The book "Johnny Depp: A Kind of Illusion" states that the Depp family originated with a French huguenot Pierre Deppe who settled in Virginia.

I'm inviting User talk:Nikki88 and User talk:Arniep to discuss the reference here. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 00:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

It's OK we sorted it out- Nikki doesn't mind it being included. Arniep 00:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Sounds good! I hate to see two good-faith editors reverting each other. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 00:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I've spoken to Arniep about the editing and I'm alright with leaving the statement. But just for the heck of it, I'll take up on Jim's offer to further get my point across. Things that are stated here are taken as fact, and there's very little chance of tracing an American family back to one man. I emphasize American family because a lot of times Americans, (especially from places like Kentucky), are too diverse and mixed to determine such a thing. Also, just because surnames are similar in spelling, doesn't mean they come from the same countries. Of course it's possible that the French huguenot from Virginia statement is true, but it seems purely whimsical to me. So I think it's safe to keep it down to what we know for sure, and what that person has openly stated in several interviews, as I think that best fits Wikipedia's standards; and what is fact is German, Irish and Cherokee. But if it's fit to include the statement, then I'm not at liberty to continue removing it, and that's fine, no big deal. Nikki88 00:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I also think the "Depp"/French thing should be included. In fact, I included it a long time ago and I didn't realize it has since been removed. Depp is clearly more "things" than Irish, German and Cherokee. Probably a lot of English ancestry from some of his family surnames, just not exotic enough to mention. Mad Jack 00:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you say "there's very little chance of tracing an American family back to one man" - yes people of the same surname aren't necessarily all descended from the same person, but in Depps case detailed research has been done by many members of the Depp family that shows this. Arniep 01:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

As long as everyone is in agreement that the text we have is neutral and verifiable, then we're good. We can probably add "ISBN 1905287046" in there somewhere as well. Also, would it be a good or bad idea to note that the book is an unauthorized biography? -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 01:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

BTW, has Depp specifically disputed the Huguenot theory, or as he just said he doesn't know his family background? -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 01:15, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

No he's never mentioned it. Bear in mind the link goes back to 1700 so it's unlikely he knew about it. Arniep 01:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure, it's fine by me. Although, I think Jim has the right idea of adding that it came from an unauthorized book, if so add as you see fit. Then maybe everyone will be happy? :) Nikki88 01:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

on his myspace site, he says that he is native american. so i think that is what he considers himself.

[edit] Image Needed?

It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

I'm quite surprized there isn't a picture for this actor yet. Would someone mind adding one that doesn't violate copyright? Tomodachigai 15:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

There have been a few different images used recently, all of which tie to one movie or another. It would be nice if someone would find an image of Depp where he isn't in character. salamurai 04:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Iconic

I was not the first to add this word, it was there before, but CovenantD felt the need to remove it while reverting unnecessary statements made by 81.156.161.89 (contribs). However, I do see it fit to keep in the article; Johnny Depp is iconic, all the way from his quirky film roles, to his style and life. He's been considered an "iconic" actor for the past decade. I see no reason not to have the word in his introduction. Please do explain why you feel it should be removed. Nikki88 05:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Considered by whom? Nothing in the article provides a source for such a description. CovenantD 18:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Is he not considered "iconic" to you? Quoted from the dictionary, iconic; of, pertaining to, or characteristic of an icon. He's not yet an icon, but himself and choice of characters have become iconic; such roles as Captain Jack Sparrow and Edward Scissorhands. As for sources, when it comes to adding a small statement as this, all you can provide are numerous articles. As a long-time fan of Depp, I can personally tell you I've seen the word associated with his name too many times to count. Here's a few 'sources' if it helps: [6] [7] [8] I don't see why you feel the need to continue removing the word. Nikki88 02:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

What either of us think about it is irrelevant - that would qualify as OR and POV, both of which are strictly frowned upon. Now that a source has been supplied (only the first, The Gate, actually refers to him personally as iconic), that objection to including it is covered. That said, I don't think the lead section is the right place for it. Perhaps somewhere in the "Career" section? CovenantD 03:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't mind where it goes, I could go without it, I just felt the need to oppose as I saw no reason in removing it. The links I provided, aside from the first link, the third does state iconic (first paragraph, second sentence). The second link I added to support my comment of his chosen character roles being iconic. Adding it to the "Career" section would be fine of course, although, an idea will have to be thought of to place it in that section. Having it remain in the introduction seems to flow a little more smoothly and doesn't place as much stress on the subject. But perhaps under the circumstance of adding the new source, it would make more sense in the Career section; I understand Wikipedia's rules on having reliable sources to support statements, but having to show a reference for one little word in the first sentence of his article will look silly, as it's not something you see often. Either way, please do with it what you see fit. Nikki88 03:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Drugs"

I wonder if there needs to be a Wikipedia-wide policy or even project to clean up inappropriate uses of words such as "drugs" and "addiction". Inaccurate use of such words contributes much to the general confusion about these concepts. In this article, for example, I made it explicit that Depp was accused of allowing illegal drugs to be sold (by any reasonable definition, caffeine is a drug, and I imagine caffeinated drinks were being sold at Depp's club) and exactly what one of his customers ended up overdosing on. The conflation of everything psychoactive that happens to be illegal in a given place under the name of "drugs" can lead readers to draw inappropriate inferences. (If people can die from overdosing on "drugs", and marijuana is a "drug", then people can die from overdosing on marijuana, right? If "drugs" are addictive, and LSD is a drug, then it must be addictive, right? (In case the reader doesn't know, marijuana overdose is nearly impossible and at least a lot harder to do than alcohol overdose, and LSD is not addictive in any meaningful sense of the word.)) While it is not up to Wikipedia to promote any particular political POV, it is important in such a touchy issue not to even imply anything that is in fact not true. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 145.116.236.110 (talk) 00:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Possible Uncredited Appearance

In the video for the 1989 Martika single, "Toy Soldiers", the singer's boyfriend is shown a few times and looks remarkably like Depp, but because of the vague shots used, this is hard to confirm.

[edit] Filmography table

What is wrong with the filmography table? None of the column and row borders are consistent. Filmforlife 19:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lily-Rose

Do you think the Lily-Rose health scare should be added to the article? It's been confirmed that his daughter was struck with e-coli, which in turn occured her liver to almost shutdown. Lily-Rose almost lost her life in this whole mess, and I think it's an important event that should be added to the "Personal Life" section.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../j/o/h/Talk%7EJohnny_Depp_9a2e.html"