Talk:John McKay (attorney)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] WE MUST NOT CITE TALKING POINTS MEMO
I want to point out that we must not cite Talking Points Memo. IT IS A BLOG AND VIOLATES ABOUT 20 HUNDRED WIKI POLICIES. Regardless of the fact that CJR Daily says about TPM, http://www.cjrdaily.org/behind_the_news/how_talkingpointsmemo_beat_the.php, How TalkingPointsMemo Beat the Big Boys on the U.S. Attorney Story.
Remember DO NOT CITE TALKING POINTS MEMO! IT WOULD BE BAD VERY BAD AS IN TOTAL PROTONIC REVERSAL IF THE WIKIPEDIA STARTED CITING BLOGGERS.
Cite ONLY MAINSTREAM MEDIA THAT COPIED THE STORY FROM TALKING POINTS MEMO.
Do we all agree? Can I get a strong support? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.39.78.68 (talk) 04:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC).
- No, wait, what do you mean? It's not entirely clear :-\ rewinn 05:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] What's Grounds for Neutrality Dispute?
Since nothing in Talk explains why it's there, I'll removed the pov-section tag. If you wish to put it back, please explain the POV problem so it may be addressed. rewinn 05:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)