User talk:Joeconsumer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] License tagging for Image:TrussTubeDob.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:TrussTubeDob.jpeg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Some advice on the image since it will help the page Dobsonian telescope, and its something I know about from 10 years in the news/graphics business (can you say checkered career? ;^)). Commercial companies specifically restrict use of their images in any editorial use... even basic news because they make them strictly for promotion. An editorial article may not be promotion of a product.... it may even be detrimental or derogatory. That is probably why there is no good tag to use a commercial image (I have banged my head against this my self asking "WHY CANT I SCAN IN A QUESTAR AD PIC?!?!?!?!?!?!?" till I though back to what I have seen on AP image service "to be used ONLY with stories about the specific product"). The best tag I have seen is Fair use in|article (add tag code to work). The problem is it wont pass "Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information".... there is a free equivalent available--->

[edit] Dobsonian telescope edits

Good addition to the page but there are a few problems fact and encyclopedic wise. A section is titled "Second Generation “Truss Tube” Dobsonians" but describes commercial adaptations instead of describing the designs in the amateur telescope making world where Dobsonians were really developed. Second Generation “Truss Tube” Dobsonians were not "invented" in 1989. Many existed way before then. And is there proof of a clearly demarked "Second Generation" and not just an evolution [citation needed]? A better title for that whole section would probably be "Continued Evolution of the design" and it should be re-writen to describe those evolved designs and not commercial adaptations. Info on commercial adaptations could go under a sub heading titled "Commercial adaptations". Statements like "Truss Tube Dobsonians are the largest commercially available telescopes available to amateur astronomers" need to be backed up by references. The info is all good and a worthy addition IMHO, it just needs a little cleanup to make it more encyclopedic. Halfblue 15:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Vigo The Carpathian.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vigo The Carpathian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)