Talk:Joe Kelly (Freeholder)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Kelly (Freeholder)

The result of this AfD discussion was keep.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  16:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't look like any effort was made to add the results of the google search attesting to this man's notability after it was brought up in the AfD. The article is in the same state it was before it was nominated, which is just as it was when it was created in March. After being untouched for five months, I doubt that there is any great urgency for the author to expand it. As it is, no matter how notable the man may be, there is no such assertion in the article, and the article is not up to standards. If it's not fixed in due course, it should be re-nominated. DarkAudit 17:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Still no claim of notability

If there is a claim of notability 'based on a Google search', then put it in here. If you are too busy to work on this based on your '4500 article watchlist', then I suggest you lighten the load. The 'keep' decision was based on crystal ball claims of notability, and no proof has been forthcoming. If the article isn't going to be expanded, then it should be deleted. In it's current form, it is a textbook case of an article that fails WP:BIO. Another AfD will be coming if it isn't expanded on soon. DarkAudit 16:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)