Talk:JIRC

Article listed on WP:VFD July 11 to July 17 2004, rough consensus was to keep. Discussion:

Is this article-worthy? RickK 23:17, Jul 11, 2004 (UTC)

It's as article-worthy as any of the other IRC clients there are articles about... Keep. Spectatrix 00:10, 2004 Jul 12 (UTC)
I agree, although it does seem a little like an advertisement for the client. Or maybe it just needs some clean-up. But other than that, I don't see why you'd delete it. Keep. kmccoy 00:47, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I cleaned it up a bit, its still a littly "flashy" sounding, although I'm convinced its not just an ad, there are too many disadvantages included. Anyways, i'll give it a keep. —siro χ o 03:02, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. "We have a lot of articles about unremarkable software projects" isn't an argument for keeping this one. Clear away the lot of them, one at a time. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:14, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Delete—agree with Wile E. Postdlf 06:03, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Delete - agree with above - Tεx τ urε 17:53, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Keep. It's at least in the top-ten list of most used IRC clients. I've used it when IRCing from somewhere other than home. Perhaps it could use a little NPOV stank put on it, but I see no problem with the article. DryGrain 17:07, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Keep. —Lady Lysiŋe Ikiŋsile | Talk 17:53, 2004 Jul 14 (UTC)
Keep --Buster 15:53, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)

End discussion

[edit] Freeware/Shareware/Miscellaneaware?

It might help to have an infobox in this article at some point or at least a line detailing the availability of this client.