User talk:Jimjones5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This userpage will be deleted after a reasonable period of time.

This user talk page has been protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from introducing vandalism to it. If you have come here to issue a new warning to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

I DID NOT delete your pornograph page as you've accussed me on my User Page. Your "good work" was deleted by someone who has that capability (an Administrator). I do not. Take up your cause and blame with Wikipedia ... not me.

Spyneyes 05:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

As long as you are going to argue and complain, you will not be allowed access back into the site. Two administrators now have declined your unblock. Please do not ask again. --Pilotguy ^{(roger that)} 00:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been denied for the following reason(s): Vandalism-only account; no reason why you want to be unblocked; consider Uncyclopedia Request handled by: Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 00:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Do not remove this template from your page.

Contents 1 Not vandalism only 2 Pornograph 3 Unwarranted warning 4 Warning given to me by Jimjones5 5 Blocked

Not vandalism only

This is not a vandalism only account. I have added information to the articles on 'Jim Jones', 'Words to Avoid' 'David Cross' 'Pornograph' etc. Please do not ban me. I only vandalized the phonograph and thomas Edison articles to keep the Pornograph article there. I needed resources before my hard well-written work got destroyed. I couldn't find any good primary or secondary resources at the moment (I need to go to a proper research Library, which I planned on going to this weekend)so I faked sources from other Wikipedia sights. I'm sorry, please unban me. I was just stressed out at having all the good information I provided on pornograph deleted.

Jimjones5 00:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

---

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, per ruling of administrators, Jimbo Wales and/or the Arbitration Committee. See contributions, page moves, current autoblocks and block log.

Pornograph

Hey, why did you delete my article on the pornograph? I know it wasn't perfect yet, but it was just a stub. I had planned on adding more to it and fixing the grammar/spelling later. Please undelete it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jimjones5 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 18 July 2006 (UTC).

Thanks for your message. Please sign your posts on talk pages using ~~~~ at the end.

Pornograph was deleted as it is patent nonsense, and a hoax.

Thanks for your contribution, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. I hope you can help us out!

If you would like to write an article about it, please try the Uncyclopedia. Stifle (talk) 19:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Actually, pornograph is not nonsense. It is a new thing that is sweeping college campuses around the country (America). I'm sorry if you haven't heard about it yet, but thousands of people are learning about it every day, and I thought they might turn to Wikipedia to find out what exactly it is. I'm sorry if you feel that Wikipedia should not include information on new products and trends. I thought that was an advantage wikipedia had over other, paper-based encylcopedias. I hope you are not targeting me because I am Jewish because that is racism.Jimjones5 19:59, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I mean, if we can have an article for Beer_pong I see no reason we shouldn't have one for pornograph. It's the same thing. A lot of people who don't go to college have no idea what beer pong is, so they look at Wikipedia and figure it out. The same people would look to Wikipedia for information on pornograph. So please undelete the page. Jimjones5 20:20, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

While not getting into details on whether discriminating against Jews, which I am not doing, can be classed as racism, I will undelete the page if you show me reliable sources (two will do) for the existence of this item. Stifle (talk) 21:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

You also have the option of making a listing at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Stifle (talk) 21:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

If this thing is notable in the future, it still is not notable now. It may be recreated then Maybe it will be notable when I get to college... --Kitia 21:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Template:Wr3

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism to Thomas Edison will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~ 85.210.62.83 22:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Unwarranted warning

You gave me a warning, I am presuming because of this edit. Please read WP:STAR for reasons why I removed it. Also, see WP:UP for reasons why one is able to edit anothers userpage.

If you have any questions on policies, please feel free to ask. Cheers! -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 20:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I accept your apology. I understand what it is like to be new to Wikipedia and seem overwhelmed, so like I said above, if you have any questions about policy, how to do something, ect. I can assist you as best I can or direct you to someone/something that can. Have fun out here! -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 20:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Warning given to me by Jimjones5

Jimjones5 (talk • contribs) gave me this warning because of this edit. I have removed the warning since I feel this is grossly unwaranted. Let me know if I am in the wrong here. Cheers! -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 20:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Also, the user reverted their userpage here and implied "racism". -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 20:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

You deleted your warning. You aren't allowed to do that. Please obey the rules of Wikipedia. Jimjones5 20:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Plus I never implied you were a racists.Jimjones5 20:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Actually, removal of warnings "are generally prohibited", but not outright disallowed. I have stated why I have removed it both here, on my edit summary of my talk page and on your talk page. And you did imply racism by saying "maybe caused my racism." I don't even know anything about you beyond your user name (doing my part of the WP:CVU on the WP:RC page), and I have nothing against people named Jim, Jimmy, Jimminy, ect. -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 20:36, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I do not wish to take sides in this dispute, other than to state that editing someone else's user page is not generally wrong. Stifle (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

Please find somewhere else to play. Uncyclopedia may (or may not) be more appropriate for you. -- Infrogmation 23:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)