Talk:Jim Rogers (politician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

This is the first time I'm doing this, hopefully, it's correct. Jim Rogers' name is spelled wrong. It's listed as "Jim Rodgers" and not Jim Rogers. I changed what I could, but I don't know how to fix the main article's title to reflect the correct spelling of his last name. Plus, the name needs to be fix in the lower box.--Tvdir 03:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

You can move it, actually, as there's no Jim Rogers (U.S.) article right now, but before you do that, someone else should step in here and say whether or not they think "(U.S.)" is the best suffix for the article title. I might lean more toward Jim Rogers (lawyer) or Jim Rogers (politician), as both are more descriptive. (Neither one is taken, which makes them fair game for a non-administrative move, too.)--chris.lawson 03:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Chris. All that needs to be changed is his last name. Does he need a suffix? I need to do a move? Hopefully, somebody can make a decision.--Tvdir 05:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Sure thing. Anyone can do the move; you certainly don't have to do it, though. :) If no one has made a decision as to the most appropriate suffix (Jim Rogers is a different guy entirely, so we *will* need some sort of disambiguation in the title here) within 24 hours or so, I'll just be bold and move it to whichever one seems more appropriate at the time. (I haven't looked into this too deeply yet.)--chris.lawson 05:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

I did the move. And went with politician for the suffix. --Woohookitty^(meow) 09:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for making the move; I have changed the other sections / links with his incorrect name Tvdir 19:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)