Talk:Jim Gray (sportscaster)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Someone tagged this with npov without justifying their tag here in talk. I removed it since I believe Gray prides himself on this interviewing technique of provoking controversy and this is well supported by even a simple web search on his controversial interviews. TechPurism 15:42, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- "Particularly annoying, intrusive...". Hard to get more blatantly non-NPOV. I tried to cut that down a little but someone in the know should introduce something besides his few controversies. --Wknight94 (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ESPN
hes still with ESPN to my knowledge
[edit] NPOV tag
This shouldn't even require an explanation. This sentence will suffice: "This proves a latent bias against certian topics as was proven during the Pete Rose interview." This article is to biased against Gray to go untagged. It's unlikely that any reader would take this at face value, but all the same it hurts the credibility of Wikipedia as a whole. savidan(talk) (e@) 08:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
it really does seem overly negative against Gray, somewhat unjustified. 67.46.0.13 09:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)