Talk:Jill Pike
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Plus, she's smokin' hot!
Agreed. She is absolutely scorching.
[edit] Line Removal
Due to her striking good looks, Jill has attracted a lot of attention, particularly from male listeners [2]
This is verifiable information. A citation needed tag is okay, but removal of verifiable information violates WP:POV.--Marriedtofilm 15:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- It is only verifiable if a WP:RS said that, in those words. Removal, rather than a citation needed tag, is required under those circumstances. I'll let it go for now, as the article is probably going to be deleted, anyway. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 00:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- As the paragraph as been changed and the two sentences are verified "in those words," this argument is moot. --Marriedtofilm 00:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Corrected your spelling (mute > moot), and I agree now, although I still think the article should be deleted. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 10:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the sp correction! I actually think, thanks to your scrutiny, the article is better now for it. --Marriedtofilm 15:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Corrected your spelling (mute > moot), and I agree now, although I still think the article should be deleted. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 10:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- As the paragraph as been changed and the two sentences are verified "in those words," this argument is moot. --Marriedtofilm 00:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Where's her picture? Jeez, she's smoking hot! You have articles for navel lint, Pocket Pool, Dirty Sanchez, etc. and you want to delete this one. What a joke! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.96.18.5 (talk • contribs) .